U.K. SITE FIGHT: ASDA CONFIRMS INTEREST IN LONDONBERRY SITE
http://www.londonderrysentinel.co.uk/news/Asda-confirm-interest-in-city.4685110.jp” title="Asda confirm interest in city store [Londonberry Sentinel]">Asda confirm interest in city store [Londonberry Sentinel]
SUPERMARKET giant Asda has reaffirmed its desire to open a store in Londonderry.
Speculation has been growing since, in August of this year, the Sentinel first reported the retailer, owned by US market leader Wal-Mart, were looking at potential Londonderry store locations.
At that time the retail giant ruled out acquiring the former Desmonds factory site in Drumahoe or a green field site in the Gransha area of the city.
Then in September, Asda told the Sentinel it would not be the flagship tenant at a new 22 unit retail park planned for the Crescent Link.
Now the company’s Property Communications Manager Philip Bartram has said opening a store in Londonderry remains a viable option.
Read the rest of this story ...
Topics: | | | | | United Kingdom
Posted by Luke West on Wednesday, November 12, 2008 | Permalink
Corpus Christi, TX. Will Shopping At Wal-Mart Bring People to Jesus?
Wal-Mart has 4 existing stores in Corpus Christi, Texas-—two of them supercenters. But the company has been scouting out a number of new sites---some of which have died, some of which have been resurrected. A new site announced this week has one local pastor wondering if more people will find Jesus if a Wal-Mart is built near his church. One thing he knows for sure: he’s going to see more traffic on narrow city roads. On February 19, 2008, Sprawl- Busters reported that Wal-Mart had been hit with a double whammy in Corpus Christi, Texas. One planned supercenter was dead, and a second was mired in a landlord-tenant lawsuit. The dead project was on the southside of the city, in the Timbergate neighborhood. According to the Caller-Times newspaper, Wal-Mart got a waiver approved by the city’s Planning Commission in November 2007, after resubmitting their plans for a rezoning. In March, 2007, Wal-Mart squeaked by the Planning Commission on a 5-3 vote in favor of the project. But in June, Wal-Mart withdrew their rezoning application for South Staples Street just one day before it was scheduled to come before the City Council. Normally, if an application is pulled, the proponent has to wait a full year before resubmitting. But in this case, Wal-Mart asked that their cooling off period be cut in half.
Wal-Mart wanted the city to change the land from its current designation of single family, to a neighborhood business district. To apply for the neighborhood business zone, Wal-Mart had to eliminate a tire and lube center from the mix. City staff admitted that granting a waiver was a “rare occurrence.” But when the Planning Commission met, they voted unanimously to approve a “rare” waiver for Wal-Mart, allowing the company to proceed with their rezoning application. Corpus Christi planning staff said at the time that the retailer had not given them enough information to make a decision. “We need time to review and recommend and we’re frankly not convinced (the latest information from Wal-Mart is) adequate, but it’s at least a step in the right direction,” the city’s planning director told the Caller Times. But by February, 2008, plans for the Southside Supercenter had fallen apart, because the landowners announced that they were selling the property to the H.E.B. grocery chain. In the meantime, the second Wal-Mart project at the Parkdale Plaza, a 203,000 s.f. supercenter, ran into a landlord-tenant dispute. Dueling lawsuits were filed by the Parkdale Plaza owners and their tenants, the Sutherlands, a home improvement chain store in 13 states in the south, Midwest and Gulf Coast. The Sutherlands were sued for allowing their parking lot to deteriorate and become pitted. The Parkdale Plaza owners were sued by Sutherlands for violating an agreement not to allow a direct competitor to the home improvement store into the Plaza. Sutherlands said their lease prevents the landlord from allowing another prospective tenant to be “permitted to sell building materials and/or home improvement supplies and services.” Sutherlands wanted Wal-Mart to show that its product mix would not affect Sutherlands’ business and current lease. The Parkdale Plaza owners said the Sutherlands lawsuit was freezing progress on the Wal-Mart Supercenter and that Sutherlands needed to maintain its parking lot, or the company could face a termination of their lease.
Read the rest of this story ...
Topics: | Community Impact | Crime & Safety | Economic/Small Business | Traffic/Sprawl | | |
Posted by Al Norman on Wednesday, November 12, 2008 | Permalink
Sartell, MN. Wal-Mart Pays To Protect The Eagles
The city of Sartell, Minnesota has roughly 14,300 people. The city claims it is “the place you’ve been looking for.” For Wal-Mart Realty, that’s certainly the case. The community is located in Central Minnesota along the banks of the Mississippi River. Sartell describes itself as “a great community…experiencing growth and advancement in economic development and technology.” The city is trying to promote its quality of life as an attraction for new businesses. “Sartell offers quiet, tree-lined neighborhoods, a growing business sector, an exceptional education system, top-notch health care facilities and opportunities to grow - an ideal place to work and live. In fact, Sartell is one of Minnesota’s fastest growing communities and for good reason.” Sartell is just minutes away from downtown St. Cloud and about an hour from the Twin Cities. As city leaders say, “Sartell provides a combination of small town character and big city opportunity.” The city has no downtown, for historical reasons.
Sartell once had a “downtown” on the east side of the Mississippi along Highway 10. In the 1960’s Highway 10 was re-routed and greatly contributed to the demise of the downtown area. Then the construction of the new bridge over the Mississippi in the early 1980’s replaced the remaining businesses. Sartell’s relied on St. Cloud’s major retail center nearby, and as a result, the city never developed a traditional “downtown.” Today, Sartell residents have to drive 5 miles to the nearest Wal-Mart discount store in St. Cloud. For folks living in small town Minnesota, apparently a 5 mile trip to find cheap, Chinese products is just too much to ask. There are also four Wal-Mart supercenters within 40 miles of Sartell, but they might was well be in another country. So when Wal-Mart came knocking, city officials in Sartell gave the giant retailer the keys to the city. The city has approved a new combination Sam’s Club and Super Wal-Mart, which clearly will serve a much larger population than little Sartell. City officials made a deal with the giant retailer to underwrite the cost of a park and “eagle habitat.” On November 5, 2008, the Sartell Joint Planning Commission unanimously approved site plans for the Sam’s Club and Superstore, as part of a larger development called Epic Center, which sprawls over nearly 100 acres.
Read the rest of this story ...
Topics: | Community Impact | Economic/Small Business | Environment | Traffic/Sprawl | | | |
Posted by Al Norman on Wednesday, November 12, 2008 | Permalink
NORTH CAROLINA SITE FIGHT: CONTROVERSY IN GREENVILLE
Possible Wal-Mart bringing controversy, possible jobs [WNCT-TV (N.C.)]
750 jobs could be coming to the east. The problem is there might not be enough room.
Tonight, Greenville’s Planning and Zoning Commission will vote on an amendment that could pave the way for a new Wal-Mart store.
Greenville Chief Planner Harry Hamilton tells me a site developer for Wal-Mart has been checking out this 60 to 80 acre site for about a year now.
The problem they are faced with now is that the land is divided into portions which only allow for eight to 10 acres of commercial development.
Wal-Mart requires at least 52. Without changes to the amendment, the lot will remain vacant.
Tonight, the city’s Planning and Zoning Committee will hear from the developer.
If the amendment is approved, work will begin next summer.
We’ll have more from the meeting and upset homeowners tonight at 11.
Also see: Council votes 4-2 to deny change to land-use plan [The Daily Reflector (N.C.)]
Topics: | legislation | Zoning Regulations | | |
Posted by Luke West on Friday, November 07, 2008 | Permalink
ILLINOIS SITE FIGHT: CONSTRUCTION DELAYED IN STREATOR
Groundbreaking for the Streator Wal-Mart supercenter has been postponed due to unresolved negotiations relating to the construction of the project.
“In essence, the general contractor’s entered bid is considerably over budget,” said John Bisio, director of public affairs for Wal-Mart in Illinois. “As a result, we are having to push things back. I want to make clear that, at this point, nothing has been determined in a definitive way whether we’ll break ground this year.”
Groundbreaking was scheduled Friday near the northeast corner of Bloomington and 15th streets on the city’s North Side. The supercenter building is to encompass 156,399 square feet, and a signaled entrance to the parking lot will be created along Bloomington Street/Route 23.
Wal-Mart does not have a timeframe for when the contractor’s bid will be resolved, Bisio said, but will continue to work with the contractor to reach an agreement. If progress is not made, Bisio said Wal-Mart eventually would rebid the project so it could move forward.
The end of the construction season is nearing, so it is likely construction will be delayed through winter. However, late February or early March is not an uncommon time to begin construction, Bisio said.He assured, though, the retail giant remains interested in coming to Streator.
“We still believe this project is relevant and it represents an opportunity to serve what is really an underserved trade area of Wal-Mart customers and consumers,” he said. “We feel this is a viable project.”
Posted by Luke West on Friday, November 07, 2008 | Permalink
NEW JERSEY SITE FIGHT: NEW WAL-MART PLANNED
http://suburban.gmnews.com/news/2008/1106/front_page/001.html” title="Wal-Mart, restaurants proposed on Rte. 18 [Suburban News (N.J.)]">Wal-Mart, restaurants proposed on Rte. 18 [Suburban News (N.J.)]
Not everyone was happy to hear that Wal-Mart may soon be moving into the neighborhood.
Many residents turned out at the Oct. 28 Old Bridge Planning Board meeting, some armed with multicolor signs stating “Stop Corporate Greed!” Others wore T-shirts reading Wal-Mart underneath a giant red X.
The retail giant is seeking preliminary and final site plan approval to build a retail complex at Route 18 and Marlboro Road, where the Legends Golf Center operated.
The 53-acre Legends site became the focal point of a dispute when its owner, Greg Matzel, failed to get Zoning Board of Adjustment approval for 450 apartment units on the then R-120-zoned site in 2004. The township subsequently adopted the Crossroads Redevelopment Plan, including the Legends site with the otherwise township owned tract of 500 acres. The redevelopment plan allowed for hotel/convention center and office uses on the Legends parcel.
Matzel, however, found the zone too confining and sued the township, resulting in a settlement in which the town agreed to amend the redevelopment plan to include office/hotel as well as highway-commercial district uses. The Township Council adopted the zoning changes in 2006, with officials acknowledging that the future retail uses proposed could involve a “big box” store such as a Wal-Mart.
Read the rest of this story ...
Topics: | Community Impact | Crime & Safety | Economic/Small Business | Traffic/Sprawl | Organizing | | |
Posted by Luke West on Friday, November 07, 2008 | Permalink
ILLINOIS SITE FIGHT: WAL-MART EXPANDING IN ROUND LAKE BEACH
http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=248858” title="Wal-Mart pursues new image in Round Lake Beach [Daily Herald (Ill.)]">Wal-Mart pursues new image in Round Lake Beach [Daily Herald (Ill.)]
It took more than three years of approvals but Wal-Mart Stores Inc., is set to refresh and upgrade its offerings in Round Lake Beach.
Village and store officials held a ceremonial groundbreaking Thursday for a Supercenter at Route 83 and Monaville Road, one of the first in the Chicago area to feature a new style.
“When you drive around and see a Wal-Mart, they’ll have all sorts of different looks. What we wanted to do was create a better visual image,” said Steve Nikel, real estate manager for the company.
The Supercenter will use energy efficiencies and will be smaller than originally proposed, in part because reductions in product packaging require less space.
“This is a considerable departure from what we built just a couple of years ago,” said John Bisio, manager of public affairs.
At about 175,000 square feet it will replace Wal-Mart’s original 115,000 square foot Round Lake Beach store, which opened 20 years ago in a shopping center along Rollins Road. The new store will take about a year to build and is expected to add 150 to 200 new jobs to the current workforce of about 230.
Read the rest of this story ...
Posted by Luke West on Friday, November 07, 2008 | Permalink
CANADA SITE FIGHT: WAL-MART BLOCKED
Caledonia Wal-Mart blocked? [Dunville Chronicle (Canada)]
A developer refused to let a provincial ministry decision stand in the way of a commercial and industrial development in the south end of Caledonia.
Todd Lisso, president of Forecast Inc, had plans to build a department store, grocery store, home improvement store and other retail outlets on 30 acres bounded by Argyle Street South, Sixth Line and Highway 6. These lands are perfectly located for their intended use, he noted.
On the remaining 30 acres, he wanted to build a business park with some light industrial enterprises. If the draft Haldimand County official plan was amended to add this property into the town, his project would create 500 retail jobs and 1,000 industrial jobs.
After speaking to council about the Ministry of Municipal Affairs rejection of adding this sector into the Caledonia boundary, Tisso old media he wanted council to join him in saying ‘no’.
“If council doesn’t want to take this to the Ontario Municipal Board, we will,” he said.
Once the ministry approves the county official plan, members of the public has 20 days to appeal its decision.
Read the rest of this story ...
Topics: | | Community Impact | Site Fights & Local Ordinances | Traffic/Sprawl | legislation | | | | Canada
Posted by Luke West on Friday, November 07, 2008 | Permalink


