FDIC Extends Banking Moratorium
From the Salt Lake City Tribune:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. is going to have to wait a while longer before it finds out if it can own and open a Utah-based industrial bank. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. on Wednesday extended for another year its moratorium on granting deposit insurance for industrial banks owned by retailers and other commercial entities - a move that should give Congress time to consider the issue in more depth.
From the Atlanta Journal-Constitution:
On Monday, House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) and Rep. Paul Gillmor (R-Ohio) introduced a bill to more strictly limit banking to financial companies. Frank said in a statement that the FDIC moratorium “gives us the ability to legislate and maintain the historical and necessary separation between banking and commerce.”
Since the Great Depression, Congress has generally restricted banking to financial, rather than commercial, companies. But since 1987, it has allowed commercial companies to own limited-service industrial loan companies. State-chartered ILCs were exempted from heavy federal regulation so they could focus on helping low-income industrial workers get small loans.
From Bloomberg News:
The one-year extension will give Congress time to set policy for so-called industrial banks, limited-service institutions chartered by states, the FDIC said today at a board meeting in Washington. The agency lifted a freeze on applications by financial companies.
“As I have said throughout the current moratorium, the industrial bank applicants—whether they are commercial companies or financial companies—deserve an answer,” FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair said. “For commercial companies, I’m afraid the answer is that you will have to wait a little longer.”
From the American Banker:
Thomas Curry, an independent board member, said, “Congressional action on these issues is clearly needed.” Comptroller of the Currency John Dugan said, “I strongly urge Congress to address this issue.” But one board member said the vote likely would not be the FDIC’s last on this issue. “It’s not over with our actions today,” said Office of Thrift Supervision Director John Reich. “We will likely be back here again.”
From USA Today:
Industrial loan companies (ILC) are a special type of state-charted institution that crosses traditional lines separating banking and commerce. Created at the turn of the century to help industrial workers, ILCs are a $177 billion industry.
Camden Fine, president of the Independent Community Bankers of America, called Wednesday’s FDIC move “fair and measured.”
Wal-Mart’s 2005 application to set up a Utah-based ILC sparked opposition from Congress, banks and consumer groups, who said regulators had less ability to police the parent companies that own the ILCs. There is concern that Wal-Mart would use the specialty banks to compete with existing institutions.
- Click here to read Wal-Mart Watch’s statement on the FDIC moratorium extension.
- Click here to learn more about the Frank-Gillmor ILC bill in Congress.
- Click here to learn more about the Bank of Wal-Mart.
Posted by Russ Fagaly on Thursday, February 01, 2007
Click Here for a Printer-Friendly Version







COMMENTS
Heaven forbid walmart be able to compete in the banking business.
We dont want competion in this country, do we???
Without competion we will all pay the price.
Another point, check how much profit the big banks have been making, while the american people pay through the teeth.
bry in rogers, ar
Thursday, February 01 at 03:59 PM
bry
You are correct. The big banks have a LOT of power, much, much more than Wal-Mart. They give huge sums of money and are much more suited to funneling it to politicians who toe the line. Of course they don’t want competition! Why should they have to compete? That’s the whole point of having 5 or 6 big banks controlling our economy, isn’t it?
Wal-Mart doesn’t wield power like Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo & Bank Of America. These companies have global offices, access to capital anywhere in the world, connections in all countries, the ability to channel money wherever they like, huge influence on money supply, interest rates, consumer spending and foreign investment.
The banks are in on all sorts of affairs. Citigroup has retail banking, commercial banking, private banking, weath and asset management, brokerages, insurance, etc. They are richer than most countries, and probably more powerful. The big banks have bought out or forced out smaller banks with their tremendous power. Where are the complaints?
Oh, I almost forgot. They are not Wal-Mart. Therefore, they get a pass.
EllisW in
Thursday, February 01 at 06:34 PM
If all you say is true, Ellis, why would anyone in their right mind want to introduce Wal-Mart into the mix? Talk about the fox guarding the henhouse. With Bentonville’s relentless desire to be number one and their talent for corrupting whatever they touch, letting Wal-Mart into banking is a recipe for disaster.
But let me ask anyone reading this how comfortable would you be if, in addition to a record of every non-cash transaction you’ve ever made at Wal-Mart, Bentonville also had access to your complete banking records?
All this information, by the way, to be securely stored away in an ominous looking building on the border of northern Arkansas.
Ken V in Texas
Friday, February 02 at 04:39 AM
Ken
Don’t be so foolish. Corporate America knows a lot more about you than you realize. Just skimming the surface, corporations know your height, weight, eye color, social security number, hair color, what cars you own or have owned, your address, all your email addresses and phone numbers, your insurance policies and their ID numbers, what jobs you’ve held, how much you’ve earned, who you bank and invest with, who does your taxes, whether you’ve ever been arrested and what for, whether you smoke, your general physical condition, your academic history, your credit score, everything you’ve ever purchased for which you did not pay cash, the layout of your house, whether or not you have children and where they go to school, whether you’ve ever been sued or even been to court, whether you’ve served on a jury, whether you’ve voted, what your party affiliation is, what you watch on TV, what movies you’ve rented, what websites you look at, the names and numbers of every phone call you’ve ever made and................I could go on and on. Needless to say, Corporate America probably knows more about you than the NSA could ever hope to know. So, unless you’ve had your head in the sand for a decade, you should know that, unless you’re completely off the grid, Corporate America is watching you. They know what you like, what your preferences are, what catalogs and coupons to send you and so on.
It’s the Information Age, brother. Do you not think that Bank Of America knows more about you than your spouse does?Even if Wal-Mart got into this act, they would be a Johnny Come Lately to the party. The corporations are already watching us and have been for decades.
EllisW in
Friday, February 02 at 09:25 AM
“Even if Wal-Mart got into this act, they would be a Johnny Come Lately to the party.
And what, pray tell, is stored on this?
“By its own count, Wal-Mart has 460 terabytes of data stored on Teradata mainframes, made by NCR, at its Bentonville headquarters. To put that in perspective, the Internet has less than half as much data, according to experts. ‘04”
Ken V in Texas
Friday, February 02 at 11:16 AM
Consider this—one of the sponsors of the Frank-Gilmor ILC Bill is Rep. Barney Frank of Massachusetts.
Also, consider this, Bank of America, the successor to former Boston-based FleetBoston Financial, is the bank with the largest market share in both Massachusetts and Conneticut (and significant in the rest of New England, as well). It’s noteworthy to mention that though BofA is headquartered in Charlotte, NC, they now have a significant number back-office/headquarters functions based around New England.
Given Ken Lewis’ (BofA Chairman/CEO) recent remarks opposing Wal-Marts quest for an ILC, I can now see why Rep. Frank is so eager to get this bill pushed through Congress.
Jim Bunch in St. Louis Metro, MO
Friday, February 02 at 12:03 PM
Ken V,
“With Bentonville’s relentless desire to be number one”
And, you don’t think that all of the Big Banks don’t want to be No.1? All businesses want to grow to be No.1!! You work for AMGEN, don’t you think they want to be No.1 in the Biotech arena?
Bob in
Friday, February 02 at 01:14 PM
It’s one thing to get to number one by working for it , like walmart did, however it’s another thing to want to get to the top by stoping, or not allowing competion.
Banks across the country dont want to compete with a company like walmart, that might make them look bad, or force them to treat there customers a little better.
The people we put is office have no business getting envolved in private business, and, competition, in the retail world. MONEY SPEAKS LOUD.
When competition is done away with, IT WILL COST ALL OF US.
bry in rogers, ar
Friday, February 02 at 01:55 PM
bry in rogers, ar - “The people we put in office have no business getting involved in private business.” That is true to an extent. However, there has to be certain set standards, mandates, and security provisions, to ensure that certain laws are not being broken. If we put the same level of trust into CEO’s/topshareholders as we put into the individuals who purchase one newspaper from a newspaper machine, and expect them not to take more than one newspaper off the top, we’d be in alot of trouble! Do you know what the difference is, in between Kenneth Lay and President Bush??? I can vote President Bush out of office!!! With people/organizations like Kenneth Lay, Jeff Skilling, Enron, Worldcom, etc., action is not taken, until the damage has already been done!!! When “Greed” is the #1 motivating factor for crime, you especially don’t let people in those types of positions, run “Buck wiled” with the financial future of America in their hands!!!
POWER TO THE PEOPLE!!! in Muncie,IN
Friday, February 02 at 07:25 PM
Actually, POWER, you can vote your CEO out of office. Just buy enough stock to give the Board of Directors a hard time. Activist shareholders like Kirk Kerkorian, Carl Ichan and Nelson Peltz have been pretty successful doing just this over the past several years.
Define “greed”. Is “greed”, by your definition, believing in profit? Is it “greedy” to want to make as much money as possible? If profit is not important, why does our economy revolve around corporate earnings and stock prices? Why are there literally TRILLIONS of dollars invested in our economy?
Let me define “greed” for everyone. To anti-Wal-Mart people/liberals/trust fund babies, etc. “greed” is the belief that when X gains one, Y must, by necessity, lose one. And this goes against the entire concept of liberalism. Standards are unfair because some people are too lazy to conform to them. Logic is unfair because it is not emotional and doesn’t allow for wiggle room. Liberals don’t like being painted into a corner.
My definition of “greed” is someone taking, by force or fraud, the property of another. This type of greed is merely theft. I do not believe that the desire for profit maximization makes one greedy. I understand capitalism and I know that my neighbors gain does not necessarily mean my loss. The pie grows all the time. It is not a static pie (our economy). As long as someone does it legally, I don’t care how much they earn. If they make more than me then obviously they deserve it because they are much smarter. I have to carve out an exemption for trial lawyers, doctors and unions-three groups that artificially inflate their wages through the limiting of competition and/or ethically challenged practices.
People like Bill Gates are rich because they are smart. It is no one’s business what Gates does with his money. I don’t care if he spends $1 billion on a house and $5 billion to buy a small country somewhere. I don’t care if he uses $1,000 bills to light cigarettes or wipes his ass with $100 bills. It is not my money and it’s none of my business. If he dies and leaves every dime to his kids, that is not my business, either. Wealth is already taxed numerous times. Personal property is not the state’s to give us. Greedy, to me, is someone who wants something that belongs to someone else and will not work legally to acquire it.
EllisW in
Friday, February 02 at 09:35 PM
Bob, you may want to put new batteries in your sarcasm detector. I don’t work for Amgen...lol
Ken V in Texas
Saturday, February 03 at 03:55 AM
Ken V,
“Bob, you may want to put new batteries in your sarcasm detector. I don’t work for Amgen...lol”
Why would anyone detect as scarcasm, when someone claims they work somewhere? What I would call it, is lying!! Do we think that Dave the ironworker is just being scarcastic, no, we take him at his word. Maybe, everything you say is scarcasm and you actually work for Wal-Mart as a shelf stocker and just hope you can get a raise out of this.
Bob in
Saturday, February 03 at 11:51 AM
I’ve got some ocean-front property in Arizona you might be interested in, Bob. It’s my fault you’re dumb as a doorknob?
Ken V in Texas
Saturday, February 03 at 12:11 PM
About my above statement regarding the people we put in office.
Some of them have been runing around the country talking bad about walmart, they have no business doing that on our money, they work for us.
Now as for the law regulating the banking business, not for a minute do i think walmart should be allowed to do banking without doing it according to the laws. as a matter of fact walmart would probably be watched more than the other banks, a lot more.
bry in rogers, ar
Saturday, February 03 at 03:02 PM
Ken V,
“I’ve got some ocean-front property in Arizona”
If you do, you are the one who is dumb as a doorknob, for falling for that old scam.
“It’s my fault you’re dumb as a doorknob?”
No, don’t blame yourself, as it’s not true, so, it’s not your fault, because you haven’t got me to believe your dribble yet!!!
By the way, where are you working this week, Microsoft?
Bob in
Saturday, February 03 at 10:12 PM
Bob, did you know the word <b>gullible<b> doesn’t appear in the dictionary?
Ken V in Texas
Sunday, February 04 at 04:51 AM
Ken V,
That’s only because you haven’t given them your picture yet.
Bob in
Sunday, February 04 at 06:17 PM
Comment Policy
WalmartWatch.com reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to remove or refuse to post blog comments.