Friday Blog Roundup: Wal-Mart Women Win

roundup

Wal-Mart Women Win

seligman

  • Wall Street Journal Legal Blog: Wal-Mart to Face Class-Action Suit
    A federal appeals court ruled today that Wal-Mart must face a class-action lawsuit alleging female employees were discriminated against in pay and promotions. The ruling paves the way for what could become the largest-ever pay discrimination suit. If a jury were to find discrimination, Wal-Mart could face multibillions of dollars in damages claims.
  • Wall Street Journal Law Blog: Lawyer of the Day: Brad Seligman
    Yesterday, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit affirmed class-action status for a suit alleging gender discrimination in pay and promotion at Wal-Mart. More than 1.5 million past and present female employees of the retailer are included in the suit.

    Wal-Mart has said it plans to ask an en banc panel to rehear the case. But for now, the 2-1 decision represents a big win for the co-lead plaintiffs lawyer in the case, Brad Seligman, the founder of the Impact Fund, a Berkeley, Calif., non-profit organization that, among other things, bring “public interest impact litigation.”
  • Wal-Mart Watch Blog: The Women Of Wal-Mart Will Have Their Day In Court
    Wal-Mart’s lead attorney in the case told reporters today’s ruling was “one step in what is going to be a long process. We are very optimistic about obtaining relief from this ruling as the case progresses.” If Wal-Mart can’t get the 3 judges who sat in today’s decision to rehear the case, they also can ask for the full panel of 15 judges to hear it. The Impact Fund of California represents the women who filed the lawsuit.

    “What this shows is that no amount of PR or spin can avoid the day in court that is coming, and it’s time for Wal-Mart to face the music,” said the lead attorney for The Impact Fund. “We’re confident that the women of Wal-Mart will have their day in court.” Wal-Mart could wind up paying out billions if it loses the class-action lawsuit.
  • Click here to learn more about the Dukes v. Wal-Mart suit.

"Better Health Care Together"

  • Click here to read more about SEIU’s partnership With Fortune 500 Companies, labor and civic leaders.

Health Care In America

  • Huffington Post: Andy Stern: New Momentum to Fix Health Care in America
    Some people were surprised to learn today that I participated in a news conference with the CEOs of several major corporations - including Wal-Mart, with whom our union has major differences. We announced the formation of Better Health Care Together, a new partnership committed to building the momentum and political will we need to bring health care to every man, woman and child in America by 2012.
  • Think Progress: Why We Did It
    Some of you may be wondering why two leading progressive groups like SEIU and CAP have joined in a coalition with Wal-Mart, AT&T, and Intel on health care.  This is an important issue that deserves a direct response.

    From all of our years in organizing and government, we have concluded that the primary obstacle to health reform is not the lack of ideas. What is needed to bring about fundamental reform is new pressure for change and genuine political will. This involves going beyond the traditional coalitions of associations and advocates and political players on both sides of the debate.
  • Huffiington Post: Jonathan Tasini: Will A New Labor-Business Alliance Solve Health Care Crisis?
    Today, a new new labor-business health care coalition unveiled itself to deal with the health care crisis. Personally, I am solidly in the camp that believes that single-payer is the only rational way to change the health care system in America. But, I think it’s useful that business and labor are at the table.
  • Campus Progress Blog: The Wal-Mart Enigma
    It seems like public relations fiascos are just about the only criticisms Wal-Mart responds to. It’s good news that they’ve joined the SEIU and CAP to make progress on health care, but it can’t cover up Wal-Mart’s despicable record on labor. 

Wal-Mart Launches Movie Download Website

reel

Nazi-Themed T-Shirts: Consumerist On Congressional Letter From Congress To Wal-Mart

tshirt

  • Walmart Nazi Shirts In Chicago Tribune, Thanks To Our Readers
    Consumerist readers, for the win. A great example of the power of blogs to make a difference. With our low overhead, we’re able to stick with a story and follow it through to the bitter end, even after the AP and CNN wrote it off as a done deal. We collected reports from readers across the country, slowly compiling evidence of Walmart’s unwillingness and/or inability to properly conduct a product recall. A hill source tells us that Walmart Watch, who reads The Consumerist, were the ones that tipped off Schakowsky’s office.
  • Consumerist: Congress To Walmart: Stop Selling Nazi T-shirts
    Members of Congress started a letter writing campaign today, urging Walmart to stop selling t-shirts bearing Nazi iconography...Inside, the letter Rep. Schakowsky circulated to other members of the House and the letter to Walmart CEO Lee Scott…
  • Consumerist: Walmart Nazi Tshirt Watch: Week 12
    12 weeks after t-shirts bearing Nazi insignia were discovered in Walmart, the retailer has yet to remove them from all their stores, despite initial promises to do so within days.

Behind The Counter

Behind Closed Doors

  • BloggingStocks: How is Wal-Mart planning to go after Target?
    Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.’s "behind closed doors" meetings with its store managers and industry analysts last week was probably meant to be a "no holds barred" session" where the world’s largest retailer tries to gain a foothold into the best operating strategy it can with lessons from past failures along with store-level and industry feedback....

The End Of Corporate Civility?

roehm

  • Resonance Partnership Blog: Wal-Mart v Julie Roehm: Is this the end of corporate civility?
    But what I really don’t get is the necessity for the smear campaign. Wouldn’t it have been more civil for Wal-Mart to have let it go at with a few euphemistic words such as "bad fit" or "philosophical differences." Why start with "improper conduct." and then go to she had an affair and we can prove it.  Weren’t things once, that civil? Julie Roehm has two children and a husband. Is it necessary to sling mud? Wouldn’t Wall-Mart’s brand image been a little less tarnished by some high road behavior?

The Wal-Martization Of The World?

Site Fights Around The County

traffic

  • Wal-Mart Watch Blog: How Wal-Mart Development Impacts Transportation
    Wal-Mart prefers to build their stores where they can get the largest lots and the cheapest land. This frequently places their stores on the outskirts of municipal borders. Generally speaking Wal-Mart supercenters can only be effectively reached by automobile because they are sited away from municipal centers.

 

Posted by Russ Fagaly on Friday, February 09, 2007

Click Here for a Printer-Friendly Version

COMMENTS

There are no comments for this entry yet. Get the discussion started and post below.

Comment Policy

WalmartWatch.com reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to remove or refuse to post blog comments.