Fact Sheets

The Employee Free Choice Act Legislation that will truly make a difference for Wal-Mart workers

Wage & Hour Issues Read how Wal-Mart continually fails to pay every worker for every hour worked

Health Care Wal-Mart's still insures barely over half its employees on the company plan

Always Low Wages Poverty-level wages make life extremely difficult for Wal-Mart's 1.4 million workers

The Environment How Wal-Mart's business model is detrimental for our planet

NAACP, Civil Groups Back Betty Dukes

This was actually a little nugget turned up by The Writing on the Wal - the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund has filed a friend of the court brief supporting the plaintiffs in a historic, nationwide sex-discrimination lawsuit filed against Wal-Mart Stores.

They filed their brief before the Ninth Circuit heard arguments in Wal-Mart’s en banc appeal last week. A snippet from the Wichita NAACP blog:

LDF argued in its friend-of-the-court brief that accepting Wal-Mart’s position is not only bad policy, but also would be a radical rewriting of civil rights law. “When Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1991, the clear intent was to expand protections against workplace discrimination by extending the remedies available to victims of intentional discrimination to include money damages. Wal-Mart is attempting to undermine those protections,” said John Payton, LDF President and Director-Counsel.

LDF was joined on the brief by a broad coalition of civil rights non-profits, including the Asian American Justice Center, Latino Justice, PRLDEF, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Legal Momentum, NAACP, National Partnership for Women & Families, National Women’s Law Center, and Women Employed.

We’ll most likely be waiting for quite a bit of time while the Ninth Circuit decides whether to reverse its previous decision that allowed Dukes v. Wal-Mart to proceed as a class action. Still, it’s impressive to see such a broad group of civil rights groups stand up on the side of Betty Dukes.

Posted by Corey Himrod on Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Click Here for a Printer-Friendly Version

COMMENTS

...be waiting for quite a bit of time...

Meanwhile the meter is running. On one hand we have on-going legal expenses and on the other the looming threat of unimaginable compensation costs.

If the move toward unionization is an albatross around the neck of the Beast of Bentonville, Dukes is a millstone!

To quote from a recent Wal-Mart Annual Report:

“The Company (Wal-Mart) is involved in a number of legal proceedings, including antitrust, consumer, employment, tort, and other litigation. The lawsuits discussed below, which are among the matters pending against the Company, if decided adversely, may result in liability material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.”

Ken V in Texas
Wednesday, April 01 at 07:44 AM

Ken-

You could quote that from thier last forty 10Q quarterly reports.  This is only reported this way to inform investors that the ramifications of the lawsuits could be extremely detrimental to the company.  Seems to be standard language for them.

Wal-Mart start paying your way! in Baraboo, WI
Wednesday, April 01 at 10:35 AM

Seems to be standard language for them.

Yes, it is, but still music to my ears.

...liability material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Ken V in Texas
Wednesday, April 01 at 10:53 AM

who cares ken?

MATT IN in gresham,oregon
Wednesday, April 01 at 12:03 PM

Commenting is not available in this content entry.

Comment Policy

WalmartWatch.com reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to remove or refuse to post blog comments.