Latest Headlines
NAACP, Civil Groups Back Betty Dukes
This was actually a little nugget turned up by The Writing on the Wal - the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund has filed a friend of the court brief supporting the plaintiffs in a historic, nationwide sex-discrimination lawsuit filed against Wal-Mart Stores.
They filed their brief before the Ninth Circuit heard arguments in Wal-Mart’s en banc appeal last week. A snippet from the Wichita NAACP blog:
LDF argued in its friend-of-the-court brief that accepting Wal-Mart’s position is not only bad policy, but also would be a radical rewriting of civil rights law. “When Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1991, the clear intent was to expand protections against workplace discrimination by extending the remedies available to victims of intentional discrimination to include money damages. Wal-Mart is attempting to undermine those protections,” said John Payton, LDF President and Director-Counsel.
LDF was joined on the brief by a broad coalition of civil rights non-profits, including the Asian American Justice Center, Latino Justice, PRLDEF, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Legal Momentum, NAACP, National Partnership for Women & Families, National Women’s Law Center, and Women Employed.
We’ll most likely be waiting for quite a bit of time while the Ninth Circuit decides whether to reverse its previous decision that allowed Dukes v. Wal-Mart to proceed as a class action. Still, it’s impressive to see such a broad group of civil rights groups stand up on the side of Betty Dukes.
Posted by Corey Himrod on Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Click Here for a Printer-Friendly Version
SEARCH WAL-MART WATCH
Most Popular Tags
Top Posts
- A Walmart in Your Backyard
- Wal-Mart Exposed For “Outdated and Sexist” Hiring Practices
- John Perkins on Walmart’s Donation to Chile
- The Oakland Tribune on Our Week of Action
- Wake Up Walmart on Huffington Post
- WakeUpWalmart.com and Activists Demand Walmart Change its Sick Day Policy
- Shaw’s Grocery Chain Implodes in Connecticut
- More Walmart Workers on Medicaid, Unemployed
- Third Crib Recall in Four Months
Archive
Subscribe to this blog
Subscribe to the Wal-Mart Watch RSS Feed
![]()







View Wal-Mart Watch's videos on YouTube
Contact Us
Have a tip? Contact us.









COMMENTS
...be waiting for quite a bit of time...
Meanwhile the meter is running. On one hand we have on-going legal expenses and on the other the looming threat of unimaginable compensation costs.
If the move toward unionization is an albatross around the neck of the Beast of Bentonville, Dukes is a millstone!
To quote from a recent Wal-Mart Annual Report:
“The Company (Wal-Mart) is involved in a number of legal proceedings, including antitrust, consumer, employment, tort, and other litigation. The lawsuits discussed below, which are among the matters pending against the Company, if decided adversely, may result in liability material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.”
Ken V in Texas
Wednesday, April 01 at 07:44 AM
Ken-
You could quote that from thier last forty 10Q quarterly reports. This is only reported this way to inform investors that the ramifications of the lawsuits could be extremely detrimental to the company. Seems to be standard language for them.
Wal-Mart start paying your way! in Baraboo, WI
Wednesday, April 01 at 10:35 AM
Seems to be standard language for them.
Yes, it is, but still music to my ears.
...liability material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Ken V in Texas
Wednesday, April 01 at 10:53 AM
who cares ken?
MATT IN in gresham,oregon
Wednesday, April 01 at 12:03 PM
Comment Policy
WalmartWatch.com reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to remove or refuse to post blog comments.