No Way To Treat a Friend: Wal-Mart’s Shabby Earthquake Aid to China
Wal-Mart has been quick to take credit for its donation to earthquake victims in China, but those affected by the disaster aren’t buying the company’s spiel.
Wal-Mart has donated a little over $430,000 to victims of the earthquake, less than 1/30th what it donated to victims of Hurricane Katrina in 2005. Like this current disaster, Wal-Mart initially donated a far smaller sum to Katrina victims, but ultimately realized the PR benefit would make a larger donation worthwhile. If Wal-Mart wants a similar PR boon for its actions in China, it’s going to need to pony up a lot more dough.
Dirt Diggers Digest explains that Wal-Mart owes China big time. Wal-Mart’s $12 billion+ profits are largely made possible by cheap Chinese labor - the company sources the majority of its products from Chinese manufacturers, which are notorious for low wages and long hours. Wal-Mart also has a large retail presence in China and is rapidly expanding in the country. Considering that China is Wal-Mart’s largest supplier AND one of its largest markets, it’s in the company’s best interest to help the victims there as much as possible.
Donations Pour In, but Resentment Arises [Wall Street Journal]
The Sichuan earthquake has unleashed a flood of donations. Within China, it has also led to scorn heaped on successful people and big companies—including foreign brands such as McDonald’s Corp. and Wal-Mart Stores Inc.—whose perceived generosity somehow undershot expectations.
Among the targets was Wang Shi, chairman of real-estate developer China Vanke Co. Mr. Wang is famous in China for his success in business and for Richard Branson-like expeditions to Mount Everest and the South Pole. When his listed company donated two million yuan (about $286,000) for relief efforts after the earthquake, the backlash was swift.
In the more than 20,000 comments left on his blog, and in other online forums and chat rooms, people censured Mr. Wang at first for his “shabby” and “stingy” donation, and then for his attempt to defend himself in a subsequent blog post. He called the amount “appropriate” and wrote that natural disasters happen frequently in China, so there would be many future occasions for donations.
[Yao Ming]“I seriously despise Wang Shi!!!!!!!!!!!! I strongly demand Wang Shi donate at least 100 million yuan!!!!!!!!!!!!” an anonymous reader commented on the blog. Many people posted comments calling for people to dump the company’s shares and boycott its buildings.
The fingerpointing in part highlights social tensions as China prospers and the wealth gap widens between the successful elite and the rest of the country’s 1.3 billion people. Three decades ago, people’s incomes were largely the same, and very low. In 2007, China had 106 billionaires in U.S. dollar terms, second only to the U.S., according to Hurun Report, which compiles data on China’s wealthiest people.
“I was taken back by the overwhelming responses,” Mr. Wang says now, acknowledging that he might have been insensitive in his blog posts. In today’s China, he adds, “since we don’t have a good social safety net yet, it’s inevitable to develop a wealth-hating complex.”
On Tuesday, Vanke announced it will supply 100 million yuan for earthquake relief and reconstruction over the next three to five years. Yao Ming, worshipped as a national hero for his success in the National Basketball Association, came under attack after announcing a two million yuan donation amid online chatter that he contributed $1 million to Hurricane Katrina victims in 2005. In reality, Mr. Yao’s Katrina donation was “not anywhere near” his pledge for quake relief, said his agent, John Huizinga.
It isn’t surprising that many people believe now is the time for the wealthy to open their purses, says Dali Yang, director of the East Asian Institute at the National University of Singapore. “There’s a sense of justice in it,” he says.
Corporations have also come under fire their supposed stinginess. Dozens of people in the Sichuan city of Nanchong protested in front of a McDonald’s restaurant on Wednesday, with one handwritten poster saying, “McDonald’s, get out of Nanchong. Get out of China.” On the same day, McDonald’s announced a second-phase donation of 10 million yuan, lifting its total cash and material contributions to 12 million yuan. “We’ve been actively supporting an array of local relief efforts from the start,” a spokeswoman for McDonald’s in China said.
People posting comments online have criticized Wal-Mart for donating three million yuan ($430,700) for the quake but $2 million for Hurricane Katrina. A Wal-Mart spokesman said the cash donation is part of a larger relief effort that includes providing supplies and logistical expertise. Wal-Mart’s efforts, he said, “shouldn’t be measured by the cash donation alone.”
On Thursday, China’s commerce minister thanked foreign companies for their support following the quake. At a news conference, Chen Deming said foreign companies have given 1.95 billion yuan in cash and supplies. Altogether, as of Thursday, domestic and foreign donations totaled 21.4 billion yuan (about $3 billion), according to a report by the state-run Xinhua news agency, citing the State Council’s Information Office.
Some Chinese have argued in online forums against making moral judgments. “It’s not necessary to list who donated what,” says one online commentator. “No matter if it’s one yuan or 100 million yuan, it’s all love.”
Posted by Alex Goldschmidt on Friday, May 23, 2008







COMMENTS
“Wal-Mart has donated a little over $430,000 to victims of the earthquake,"WMW~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Whoa,WalMart donated MORE than that to Bill Clinton ,$500,000, in March,2008 ,just a couple of months ago!
ddrb in
Friday, May 23 at 11:12 AM
good
m att hew vantress in gresham,oregon
Friday, May 23 at 05:01 PM
“Wal-Mart has donated a little over $430,000 to victims of the earthquake, less than 1/30th what it donated to victims of Hurricane Katrina in 2005.”
How could Wal-Mart win this one? If they gave MORE, we would hear the anti people crying about how Wal-Mart cares more about China, than they do about the U.S.!! Now we see that this site is slamming them for not giving ENOUGH!! And, it won’t be long before we hear, that Wal-Mart is giving money to Communist China and how terrible that is, as the money will be used for missiles to bomb us!! But, if Wal-Mart gave NOTHING, we would hear how Wal-Mart doesn’t care about the suffering of their slave-wage labor in China!!
RDS in
Friday, May 23 at 09:20 PM
They are already destroying the USA with the help of wm.
.
Joe in
Saturday, May 24 at 04:03 AM
“Wal-Mart doesn’t care about the suffering of their slave-wage labor in China!!”
Well RDS gave it his usual try… he tried to spin this story to cover every possible scenario.
You were right on target with your last remark. When you consider the billions of dollars China contributes to Wal-Mart’s profits, $430,000 is a pittance, no matter how you try to spin it! As usual this one goes right over RDS’s head. It’s not the amount that’s important....more money...or less money. From a humanitarian standpoint businesses and country’s need to come together in a tragedy such as this.
The point of this story is that the piddly amount that Wal-Mart ponied up with, demonstrates once again how they really “value” suppliers and “associates.” Wal-Mart certainly LOVES China when the profits are flowing into Bentonville. Just don’t expect them to be as enthusiastic when its time to send money the other way!
Besides, RDS… if the PR people in Bentonville would be less concerned about waving flags and calling press conferences to make sure the whole world is paying attention every time they made a donation, they could always send their money and contributions anonymously to the Red Cross or some other third party relief agency. This way nobody could ever accuse Wal-Mart of seeking glory for itself or “caring more for China than the U.S.” When tragedies such as this occur, it’s not an opportunity to wring out all the PR mileage Wal-Mart can get . Wal-Mart needs to just step up and do the right thing!
Unfortunately once again, the true nature of the Beast is revealed. Wal-Mart’s actions always speak much louder than its words! In this case, it’s called,“Biting the hand that feeds you?”
ScrewedbyWal-Mart in Anytown, America
Saturday, May 24 at 07:02 AM
china contributes to your favorite stores profits too screwed by and we never hear crap from you on that.what a total moron you are.
m att hew vantress in gresham,oregon
Saturday, May 24 at 07:18 AM
They are already destroying the USA with the help of wm.
.
Joe in
Saturday, May 24 at 04:03 AM
Joe: We are they, when we choose to shop at WalMart.
ddrb in
Saturday, May 24 at 01:00 PM
Right ddrb and that goes for any company that takes their jobs overseas FOR THE LOVE OF MONEY, while they stab their own country in the back.
.
JOE in
Sunday, May 25 at 04:46 AM
Screwedby,
“Besides, RDS… if the PR people in Bentonville would be less concerned about waving flags and calling press conferences to make sure the whole world is paying attention every time they made a donation”
Seems to me, that the article above is the one talking about Wal-Mart’s contribution and rather than tell what a ‘good’ thing Wal-Mart did, they put them down for not giving enough!! And, guess what? If Wal-Mart had kept it quiet, like you said, I’m sure the Headline above would read “Wal-Mart is so ‘cheap’, they didn’t donate ANYTHING to the China earthquake victims”!! Your side will NEVER be satisfied, no matter what Wal-Mart does!!
“Wal-Mart needs to just step up and do the right thing!”
And, I guess that “right thing”, would be whatever YOU think it should be, RIGHT? And, that will always be the opposite of whatever they actually do!!
“It’s not the amount that’s important....more money...or less money.”
Then, why in the world are YOU complaining about it? After all, they did donate, HOW MUCH DID ‘YOU’ DONATE TO THE CHINA VICTIMS?
RDS in
Sunday, May 25 at 09:54 PM
Wal-mart just gave $3million to China aid the other day people!!! What has walmartwatch.com given for aid?
Really Now in Dallas, TX
Monday, May 26 at 08:36 PM
that’s rigth, w-m donated 3 millions, how much wal-mart wactch hes donated??? what’s going on with the millions of dollars you guys are getting from wal-mart’s competition
sergio sayago in toronto,on
Tuesday, May 27 at 12:44 PM
uh-Oh Walmarts hiring illegals again!
Call La Migra- hurry.
INS in
Wednesday, May 28 at 11:05 AM
RDS,
Without even waiting for a response from the anti crowd, I can tell you with near certainty that WMW and their devotees game a sum total of exactly zero dollars to China quake victims. They do not, have not, nor will they ever, care enough about foreign workers to take money out of their wallets and send it to them. I know that’s been their punch-line for years - “what about the poor people of X country?? How can we support their meagre existence by exporting jobs??” But here’s the truth: they “care” about foreign workers in so far as it helps them get what they want over here - namely, more and better blue-collar jobs. They’ll never admit it, because it reveals an underlying greed, which they so vehemently and publicly denounce. I wish someone from the anti crowd would have the b*lls to come out and admit that greed is their underlying motive, but many of them are lying to themselves as well, and don’t even consciously realize it. Sickening, isn’t it??
a big dose of truth in
Wednesday, May 28 at 02:21 PM
Dose: Would you care to prove how you can unequivocally say that ANY here have NOT donated to Chinese quake victims?Either through their church,synogague or International Red Cross? I do not understand what greed you refer to regarding the allegedly anti crowd. What I do see is abundant evidence of “pocketbook patriotism” from the pro-crowd whose primary loyalty is ALWAYS,firstly to THEIR personal bottom line-and complete indifference to who and what the hidden costs are to anyone else,anywhere else...as long as they think it isn’t them.At least,that’s what the free market mantra they promote reflects. But since you presume to have such empirical knowledge of all matters,why don’t you tell us how much China sent to the US for Hurricane Katrina and Rita? And how much the antis sent for these American hurricane victims or more recently, to disabled WalMart employee Debbie Shank?Did Chinese donate to Debbie-especially Chinese W/M workers?
ddrb in
Wednesday, May 28 at 02:47 PM
How much did the pro WalMarters send to Chinese victims,and to Debbie Shank-an American worker?
ddrb in
Wednesday, May 28 at 02:50 PM
How much did the pro WalMarters send to Chinese victims,and to Debbie Shank-an American worker?
This isn’t about “pro Wal-Marters”, *—it’s about groups like WMW versus Wal-Mart.
In that regard, Wal-Mart gave more money to both the Chinese earthquake victims and Ms. Shank than you, my dear, will ever see in your lifetime…
And what about WMW? I wouldn’t hold my breath for them to send anything to China, but if I were a donor to the Shanks’ cause (via WMW), I sure as hell would be curious how much money was distributed to the family…
bbrd in
Wednesday, May 28 at 03:34 PM
Are you Dose? Was I actually addressing you? Is it required that you read/respond and ridicule my posts? Is nastiness a necessity ,that you insult everyone on this blog if they dont happen to be other than in WalMart worship mode? I do not understand why David Nassar allows you to insult those who come here.,especially as a belligerent presence on another’s dime.
ddrb in
Wednesday, May 28 at 04:03 PM
How much did China send to victims of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita?
ddrb in
Wednesday, May 28 at 04:08 PM
ddrb,
Go ahead - prove me wrong!!!! I welcome it!!! I want it!! I’m waiting for someone to stand up and prove that they care, via dollars donated.
And yes, my primary loyalty is to my own bottom line - is that weird?? is that wrong?? what exactly is wrong with that?? Why do you go to work every day?? to pay for SOMEONE ELSE?? Of course not - you do it for YOU. Let’s all just call an apple an apple and be honest.
“why don’t you tell us how much China sent to the US for Hurricane Katrina and Rita”
Don’t know, don’t care. Chinese workers are not the ones proclaiming to care about the welfare of american workers.
a big dose of truth in
Wednesday, May 28 at 05:40 PM
You are a dose,alright,but its not a dose of the truth that your post reminds me of.
ddrb in
Wednesday, May 28 at 07:17 PM
Within China, it has also led to scorn heaped on successful people and big companies—including foreign brands such as McDonald’s Corp. and Wal-Mart Stores Inc.—whose perceived generosity somehow undershot expectations.
I know it’s fun to argue about who cares more (or less), but the “scorn” and “expectations” are coming from China!
Ken V in Texas
Thursday, May 29 at 06:38 AM
Careful, careful…
Is it required that you read/respond and ridicule my posts?
Why not? The rest of us, do!
Is nastiness a necessity ,that you insult everyone on this blog if they dont happen to be other than in WalMart worship mode?
Sorry, I have never seen anyone on the “pro” side resorting to dropping “F-bombs” and calling people “ignoramus”—if I were you, I would work on fixing what’s wrong on your side, first…
I do not understand why David Nassar allows you to insult those who come here.,especially as a belligerent presence on another’s dime.
Could it be that the powers-that-be realize belligerance goes both ways, here??
How much did China send to victims of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita?
Probably zip—Wal-Mart, on the other hand, sent more than you’ll ever see in your lifetime (seems to be a lot of that going-on...).
bbrd in
Thursday, May 29 at 08:55 AM
ddrb,
“Is nastiness a necessity ,that you insult everyone on this blog if they dont happen to be other than in WalMart worship mode?”
Which side of the fence was SDV on, when he created his imbecile list? For every insult you can produce from a Pro-side poster, I can produce 10 from the Anti-side poster!!
Joe, is another good example of someone who does little but INSULT people and he is on the Anti-side!!
RDS in
Thursday, May 29 at 12:31 PM
RDS: Are you answering doses posts now?When you’ve abdicated the personal responsibilty of answering your OWN posts to bbrd,Mary,et al? Unlike you , I don’t authorize others to answer or speak for me,as you do. How can you possibly KNOW in advance what might not be said? I do not condone some of the rhetoric on either side, and prefer, as most seem to, on the “anti side” , to speak,INDIVIDUALLY, not collectively.
ddrb in
Thursday, May 29 at 02:23 PM
In a way, we speak with one voice!!~RDS
Enough said.
Unlike you , I don’t authorize others to answer or speak for me,as you do.
But you continually spout the same rhetoric as everyone else—in fact, you take it one step further by copying/pasting whatever your “magic mouse” happens to find on any given day…
...as most seem to, on the “anti side” , to speak,INDIVIDUALLY, not collectively.
I’ll remember you said that next time I see the words “Vlasic” and “Rubbermaid” posted, here…
bbrd in
Thursday, May 29 at 03:55 PM
ddrb,
“When you’ve abdicated the personal responsibilty of answering your OWN posts to bbrd,Mary,et al”
I have not abdicated my personal responsibility of answering posts aimed at me, I just allow those others to post things that I may not have thought of at the time!!
“How can you possibly KNOW in advance what might not be said”
If something is NOT said, then I will add it, when I post!! But, basically, I have found the others posts to be similar to my views and don’t think that I would be ashamed to be associated with anything they say!! In other words, they are my kind of people!!
“to speak,INDIVIDUALLY, not collectively.”
If you are on the right side of an issue, the collective wisdom will be the same to all involved on your side!! If you find yourself disagreeing with some of the others on YOUR side, it is time to re-evaluate, whether the side you are on, is actually telling the truth or spinning!! When something is right, it’s right and there will be no disagreement!!
Take the mission statement of this site, it states ‘changing Wal-Mart’, yet, Ken V. & Screwedby, have both stated their aim is to DESTROY Wal-Mart and put them out of business, not change it, is that the anti position you have? Really, I can understand WHY you would not like others to answer for you, because some of them are pure ‘off the wall’ Kooks!!
RDS in
Thursday, May 29 at 10:51 PM
“don’t think that I would be ashamed to be associated with anything they say!! In other words, they are my kind of people!! “-RDS~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~So,RDS, when bbrd concocts a lie about being my exhusband, that we spent time together at Cape Cod,and continues the deception-you approve of this? This is your kind of person? What falsehood will be perpetrated next ,and against whom?.And why?............."When something is right, it’s right and there will be no disagreement!! “--RDS~~~~~~~~~~~No,RDS,not everyone is required to march in goosestep-THIS is why individual expression and opinion is essential. Example:That is why there are different candidates to choose from, before a final nominee is named.Even after a nominee is named, there is individual opinion.I think rdfeinmann was correct in his assessment of how narrow and limited your perceptions of the world truly are. Lastly,the anti-"kooks" to which you refer,in all probability would have reservations about giving ME a blank check to write in anything I wanted,like you have done with YOUR “peeps” .And I question your judgment to have that much confidence in total strangers----or are they?
ddrb in
Friday, May 30 at 07:28 AM
ddrb,
“So,RDS, when bbrd concocts a lie about being my exhusband, that we spent time together at Cape Cod,and continues the deception-you approve of this?”
First, how do I know that what he says isn’t true and you are the one that is lying? Second, as that has NOTHING to do with Wal-Mart, it makes little difference to me!!
“What falsehood will be perpetrated next ,and against whom?”
Seeing how many times that JOE, Screwedby and others have posted lies about me, and many times you have aligned yourself with them, where’s the difference?
“No,RDS,not everyone is required to march in goosestep-THIS is why individual expression and opinion is essential.”
But, this seems to be exactly what the ANTI crowd does, quoting others views and adopting them as their own!! When I read bbrd’s, or Mary’s or Daves, they don’t ‘cut and paste’ something someone else said, they give their “individual expression and opinion” based on Facts that can be proven if asked!! Also, when asked a question, they ANSWER in a rational and logical manner, not some INSULT, like most of the anti people do, when they have NO real answer!!
Remember, when you ‘cut and paste’ something someone else said, you are giving credence to it and saying that YOU believe it to be the definitive answer to the problem, where is the allowance for “expression and opinion”?
People like Screwedby, has even stated, that opposing opinions, should not be ALLOWED here!!
“I think rdfeinmann was correct in his assessment of how narrow and limited your perceptions of the world truly are.”
First, I have an “Open Mind”, so my perceptions are not narrow and limited, in fact, I go to great lenghts most of the time to explain my perceptions, I don’t just buy into that whole ‘Beast of Bentonville is evil’ concept that your side does!! Second, if I look outside and see it raining, I will only accept as fact, those who agree that it is raining and will reject anyone who says it isn’t, but, that’s NOT because I am being “required to march in goosestep”, it is because I got wet when I went outside!! Some here, tend to listen to others, only because they reinforce a view, but do not necessarily reflect the truth!! Believe it or not, experience, is a better teacher, than what some biased writer posts!! A good example of this is, when an anti person wrote, that “Personal Responsibility” is a Whacko Concept!!
RDS in
Friday, May 30 at 01:10 PM
RDS : “Some here, tend to listen to others, only because they reinforce a view, but do not necessarily reflect the truth!! “~~~~~~~~~~Yes, and obviously YOU are one of them if you to choose to turn around and accuse ME of being a liar to deflect from bbrd’s willful deceptions.
ddrb in
Friday, May 30 at 01:20 PM
...and continues the deception...
OK, this has gone-on, far enough—what was meant to be a satirical one-liner (well, maybe two...) has been drawn-out, long enough to put innocents like RDS in the crossfire.
As I just said, it was purely a satirical bent—for anyone out there who actually bought-into the bbrd/* story, I’m sorry I disilliusioned you folks.
As for the reality of the situation, let’s face it—she’s just not my type!
bbrd in
Friday, May 30 at 03:05 PM
In other words, they are my kind of people!!
The feeling’s mutual, RDS—the rest of us thank you for the props…
bbrd in
Friday, May 30 at 03:10 PM
I still think a nice, cozy chat room is what best suits you ‘talents’, bbrd. Who knows? You might get lucky.
“The dogs bark but the caravan moves on.” ~ Arabian proverb
Ken V in Texas
Friday, May 30 at 04:18 PM
I still think a nice, cozy chat room is what best suits you ‘talents’, bbrd. Who knows? You might get lucky.
Going four-for-four, I see, Kenbo…
Face it, no one is buying what you people have to sell, anymore…
bbrd in
Friday, May 30 at 04:23 PM
Don’t get me wrong, bbrd, guys like you and RDS are welcome foils here. It’s just that you seem to have some ‘issues’ with members of the opposite sex and I really don’t think blogging on an anti Wal-Mart site will help you.
Face it, no one is buying what you people have to sell, anymore…
Wal-Mart’s reputational problems are over? I must have missed the memo.
“It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. If you think about that, you’ll do things differently.” ~ Warren Buffet
Ken V in Texas
Friday, May 30 at 08:18 PM
ddrb,
There you go again, twisting what I said, I never said you were lying, I asked a question: “how do I know that what he says isn’t true and you are the one that is lying?”, notice the question mark?
RDS in
Friday, May 30 at 11:40 PM
It’s just that you seem to have some ‘issues’ with members of the opposite sex...
You are a master of twisting things around, aren’t you, Kenbo?
For the record, I only have issues with a certain person of the opposite sex—period.
bbrd in
Saturday, May 31 at 11:23 AM
You are a master...
When you are able to traverse the rice paper without leaving a sign, you will have learned.
Ken V in Texas
Tuesday, June 03 at 08:07 AM
Comment Policy
WalmartWatch.com reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to remove or refuse to post blog comments.