Latest Headlines
NYC Council Member: Wal-Mart Not The Answer
Not long ago, we reached out to our Wal-Mart Watch communities in New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago, asking them to contact their city councils and urge them to continue to oppose Wal-Mart’s moving into their cities. Combined, the populations of Chicago, NYC and LA house nearly 15 million people, or roughly 5% of the U.S. population.
For years, Wal-Mart has tried to build stores in those and other urban centers including Detroit, Washington, DC, and Boston. Building stores in these cities represents one of the last few rich avenues for domestic U.S growth open to Wal-Mart, but to this point it’s been one big, giant FAIL.
Since submitting our request, over 25,000 letters have been sent to the city councils in LA, New York and Chicago. And below is an example of the responses those letters have been generating - this one is from David Yassky, a member of the New York City Council currently running for New York City Comptroller:
Dear Neighbor:
Thank you for your concern regarding the recent proposals to open Wal-Mart stores in New York City. I agree that this is not the answer to our City’s economic problems, and I am concerned by the company’s poor track record regarding the treatment of its employees and its devastating effect on local businesses. Small businesses are the life-blood of our City and as the Chair of the City Council’s Small Business Committee, I will fight against the development of new Wal-Mart stores that bring more harm than good to a community.
Moreover, I strongly support passing the Employee Free Choice Act. This legislation would be an important safeguard against employee abuses. The Employee Free Choice Act would promote better working conditions and benefits for those who need it most: New York’s working families. I will continue to support this legislation and employee rights whenever I have the opportunity to do so. Thank you again for your interest.
Sincerely,
David Yassky
Council Member, 33rd District
We’ll keep updating you as we continue to get more responses. Until then, you can check out more on Wal-Mart’s Urban Problem here. What these cities need now are jobs that pay a living wage, good health benefits that keep people healthy and productive (and off public health care), and thriving small businesses that give back to their communities. Wal-Mart need not apply.
Posted by Corey Himrod on Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Click Here for a Printer-Friendly Version
blog comments powered by DisqusSEARCH WAL-MART WATCH
Most Popular Tags
associates benefits chicago employees jobs labor news profits stores wages walmart workersTop Posts
- Chicagoist’s Three-Part Series on Working at Walmart
- Good Jobs Chicago, Living wage, Wal-Mart
- A Walmart in Your Backyard
- Wal-Mart Exposed For “Outdated and Sexist” Hiring Practices
- John Perkins on Walmart’s Donation to Chile
- The Oakland Tribune on Our Week of Action
- Wake Up Walmart on Huffington Post
- WakeUpWalmart.com and Activists Demand Walmart Change its Sick Day Policy
- Shaw’s Grocery Chain Implodes in Connecticut
- More Walmart Workers on Medicaid, Unemployed
Archive
Subscribe to this blog
Subscribe to the Wal-Mart Watch RSS Feed
![]()







View Wal-Mart Watch's videos on YouTube
Contact Us
Have a tip? Contact us.








