Retailers Must Take Responsibility for Product Safety, CPSC says
Amidst the seemginly endless toy recalls this past year, one question remains unanswered: who is ultimately responsible for ensuring the quality of consumer products in the United States? The head of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, Nancy Nord, is pointing to retailers. Chronically underfunded and increasingly understaffed, it’s almost impossible for the CPSC to inspect all the imports coming in from overseas. Instead, Nord hopes to focus the CPSC on domestic-made goods, as the agency was intended to do, and leave inspection of imported goods up to retailers like Wal-Mart. What do you think: who should be responsible for these products? Do retailers like Wal-Mart have any responsibility to ensure the quality of the goods they sell?
Safety Push Focuses on Retailers [Wall Street Journal]
Retailers may come under increased scrutiny from the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the agency’s acting chairman said yesterday.
Nancy Nord said the shift in strategy is necessary because many of the 15,000 household products regulated by the agency are made abroad, not in the U.S. as most were when the agency was created in 1973. At that time, most of the agency’s enforcement efforts were focused on product manufacturers.
Amidst the seemginly endless toy recalls this past year, one question remains unanswered: who is ultimately responsible for ensuring the quality of consumer products in the United States? The head of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, Nancy Nord, is pointing to retailers.
Until now, the agency “has focused on product manufacturers, and not an awful lot of attention to retailers and making sure that retailers understood their responsibility. But with the big-box retailers coming in, that focus has changed,” she said.
A spokesman for the retail industry expressed some surprise at her remarks about the agency’s stepped-up enforcement of stores and distributors. “We agree that retailers have a role to play in all this but it is not the same sort of role as the manufacturer,” said Erik Autor, vice president and international trade counsel for the National Retail Federation, a trade group.
“The primary responsibility has to fall on the manufacturer,” he said. “Our view is that the most effective point to enforce and determine safety is at the point of manufacture. It is too late at the point of sale.”
Ms. Nord, however, cited a 2005 agreement with Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the nation’s largest retailer by revenue, that requires the Bentonville, Ark., company to report detailed data on product-safety complaints to the agency and share it with suppliers. The effort is aimed at improving product safety, especially of foreign-made goods, including toys, more than 80% of which are made overseas.
Ms. Nord also announced plans for expanding inspection of imported goods using new funds appropriated by Congress. The plans include, for the first time, posting full-time inspectors at some of the nation’s busiest ports including Long Beach, Calif., and Seattle, and implementing a new import-tracking surveillance system in cooperation with U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Ms. Nord said the inspections would target high-risk products such as toys, fireworks and electrical equipment, and suspect shipments.
As concerns about the safety of goods from China in particular reached a zenith in 2007, with recalls of millions of units of children’s toys and jewelry, several bills were introduced in Congress aimed at improving the safety of imported consumer products. Criticism of the agency and Ms. Nord mounted, with some Democratic members of Congress calling for her resignation.
In December, the House passed the first significant legislation overhauling the agency in nearly a generation on the last day of session. A Senate committee approved a bill that consumer advocates consider tougher, but it remains in committee. Meanwhile, Congress approved an additional $80 million for the beleaguered agency, which has 400 staff members.
Ms. Nord suggested that some of the media reports about product safety last year approached “hysteria,” and said the fact that the number of recalls had increased from 467 in fiscal year 2006 to 472 in 2007 was a sign that the agency was doing its job by effectively removing defective and dangerous products from the shelves.
Rachel Weintraub, an advocate for the Consumer Federation of America, who attended the speech by Ms. Nord at the National Press Club, said “acknowledging the need for the agency to change is positive” but that she was “disappointed” the agency chief seemed to suggest that product-safety concerns were overblown.
Posted by Alex Goldschmidt on Tuesday, January 08, 2008







COMMENTS
how about all retailers not just walmart accept full responsibility?of course no one on here besides me will go for that.
matthew vantress in gresham oregon
Tuesday, January 08 at 03:49 PM
The head of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, Nancy Nord, is pointing to retailers.
See? “Retailers.” Not just Wal-Mart.
Have you ever considering actually reading these blog entries before commenting, matthew?*
Ken V in Texas
Wednesday, January 09 at 01:11 PM
“who is ultimately responsible for ensuring the quality of consumer products in the United States? The head of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, Nancy Nord, is pointing to retailers.”
Sounds like ‘passing the buck’ to me!! Kind of like saying, “It’s not my job”, if not, then, What Is Their Job?
“Instead, Nord hopes to focus the CPSC on domestic-made goods”
Gee, I thought that most U.S. manufactures went out of business and moved offshore, because of Wal-Mart!! Therefore, they should have plenty of resources!!
RDS in
Thursday, January 10 at 12:35 AM
abot time ken you bitch at something else other retailers instead of wm so much.
matthew vantress in gresham oregon
Thursday, January 10 at 06:42 AM
Sounds like ‘passing the buck’ to me!!
RDS, Ms. Nord seems to be quite good at buck-passing (at least since she’s been in the news, recently).
Anyone out there recall her not wanting additional funding for the CPSC?
Gee, I thought that most U.S. manufactures went out of business and moved offshore...
Is it time for an oxymoron, yet?
bbrd in
Thursday, January 10 at 09:33 AM
“Is it time for an oxymoron, yet?”
WalMart patriots.
SanDiegoView in
Friday, January 11 at 06:29 AM
Here’s Two More Oxymorons
Wal-Mart quality.
Wal-Mart...Live Better.
ScrewedbyWal-Mart in Anytown, America
Friday, January 11 at 06:43 AM
Screwedby: Save Money. Live Better. Lobby Harder...WalMart spent $4 million $$$ in the last 18 months compared with $6.6 million it collectively spent in the prior seven years,according to federal lobbying reports.In the first 6 months of 2007,it spent $1.8 million.By contrast,Target spent only $100,000 in the first six months of 2007 on lobbying,and Sears spending $141,000.It is evident that WalMart is not discounting its lobbying presence...I’ll stay tuned to see the level of allegedaccountability for retailers in the future. Maybe it will be another gigantic loophole( to drive W/M 18 wheelers through) in future legislation,if ANY is passed.
ddrb in
Saturday, January 12 at 02:37 PM
P.S.: I did find the disclosure of a 2005 agreement between the CPSC and W/M intriguing-in essence requiring W/M to report back to the agency,as far back as ‘05,and provide detailed reports on product safety complaints and also notifying suppliers ,too. I would be curious to know how faithfully W/M executed this mandate-if unsafe items were continuously sold ,anyway-not just toys- but any products with safety complaint issues in the past two years.
ddrb in
Saturday, January 12 at 02:56 PM
Comment Policy
WalmartWatch.com reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to remove or refuse to post blog comments.