Wal-Mart, China, Want to Do Even More Business Together

This AP article in the New York Times today examines the fact that the U.S. and China are looking to increase trade, despite “protectionist tendencies” (read: consumer outrage) in both countries. The article comes on the tails of a product safety summit that harshly criticized the quality of products made in China as well as the country’s poor enforcement of intellectual property laws. Huh, that’s strange. Why would the U.S. want to do more business with a country that’s having such a hard time getting its regulatory act together?

Perhaps the answer lies with the fact that today Wal-Mart announced plans to expand operations in China by 30% this year alone. As the eighth largest economy in the world, Wal-Mart knows how to throw its weight around. When the U.S. government signs trade deals with China (and looks the other way when dangerous products turn up) Wal-Mart is the one that stands to benefit, even if it comes at the cost of consumer safety.

US, China Say Must Work Together [Associated Press via New York Times]

The United States and China, with increasingly dependent economies, have to work together to fight protectionist sentiment in both countries, officials from the countries said Monday.

The comments came on the eve of high-level meetings this week between U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Chinese officials at which China’s massive trade surplus with the U.S. and its product safety record are expected to be key issues.

‘’We have to continue opening global markets. America and China must work together to stem the tide of projectionist sentiment in out nations,’’ said U.S. Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez.

‘’It is ironic that we have found that protectionism does not protect. The only thing that does protect is innovation and engaging with the world, competing, being more productive,’’ Gutierrez told a seminar on innovation in Beijing.

Gutierrez also pointed to China’s reputation for lax enforcement of intellectual property rights, calling for ‘’consistent, transparent and equitable’’ rules to guarantee that innovation will not be stifled.

Congress has been demanding the U.S. administration act more forcefully to get China to halt what critics see as unfair trade practices. They contend China is manipulating its currency to keep the value low to boost Chinese imports into the United States while making U.S. goods more expensive in China, inflating the U.S. trade deficit with China, which last year reached a record $233 billion.

U.S. Health Secretary Mike Leavitt said China and Western countries needed to cooperate because the global market had changed so much that governments had lagged behind in regulation their booming trade.

‘’Our systems our different and yet we need to achieve a common result ... it’s a question of building bridges,’’ Leavitt said in a separate speech to the American Chamber of Commerce in Beijing.

Leavitt, who will sign an agreement Tuesday on food and feed product safety, and a second on drugs and medical devices, quoted a Chinese proverb in saying the bridge-building would take time.

‘’The man who removes a mountain begins by carrying away small stones,’’ he said.

‘’This is not about the U.S. and China, this is about the world,’’ Leavitt said.

Their comments were echoed by published remarks from Chinese officials.

Finance Minister Xie Xuren said in an interview with the official Xinhua News Agency that the protectionist sentiment in the U.S. Congress was alarming.

‘’At present, the tendency within Congress toward protectionism is in fact rather worrying,’’ Xie said.

He added the passage of such legislation would ‘’seriously harm China-U.S. trade cooperation, and in the end, harm America’s own interests.’’

Vice Commerce Minister Chen Deming was also quoted Monday in the official China Daily as saying the trade disputes with the United States should be resolved through talks.

He said a narrow focus on the value of the yuan and intellectual property rights risked ‘’hindering the normal development’’ of trade links.

Paulson said last week in Washington that U.S. worries about Chinese product safety will be a major topic at the Strategic Economic Dialogue meeting to be held just outside Beijing starting Wednesday.

China’s ability to manage the safety of its goods will be an important part of Beijing’s future growth and its trade relations with the United States, he said.

Paulson and other senior Bush administration officials in China for the third round of the talks. Paulson launched the effort a year ago, but so far it has produced few results. Vice Premier Wu Yi leads the Chinese side.

Gutierrez later attended a ceremony where Wal-Mart China announced it had received approval to open its 100th store in China. It will open in Loudi, Hunan province.

About 80 Wal-Mart employees wearing red shirts were on hand in a Beijing hotel. American products sold in Wal-Mart stores in China, such as Hunt’s barbecue sauce and apples from Washington state, were on display.

At the same time, Timken Co., a Canton, Ohio-based specialty steel company, announced it had signed a $110 million deal with Xiangtan Electric Manufacturing Company of Hunan province to form a joint venture to make bearings for wind turbines.

Posted by Alex Goldschmidt on Monday, December 10, 2007

COMMENTS

big f-----g deal the others like target,costco,fred meyer,k-mart and etc sell just as much from china and do just as much business with china as walmart does so shut up.

matthew vantress in gresham oregon
Wednesday, December 12 at 06:59 AM

Walmart are our big boy. They sixth largest trading partner compared to other nations and largest from United States. Special number one thanks to Walmart for funding People’s Liberation Army. Matthew Vantress is Chinese Communist Party favorite internet person.

Wen Mat Li in
Thursday, December 13 at 03:46 AM

vantress you commie bastard-

Wanted to thank you personally for being the Oregon taxpayer sucker of the year 2007-

Oregon
2005 - Total # of Wal-Mart Employees in State: 11,035
2005 - Estimated # of Wal-Mart Workers on Medicaid: 1,457
2005 - Estimated # of Wal-Mart Dependents on State Health Programs: 889
2005 - 2005 - Estimated Total Cost; Federal & State:$8,037,702

For all the years before and since, we want to thank vantress for willingly subsidizing WalMart at the corporate hog trough of public largess.

Thanks vantress for being the WalMart meat popsicle choirboy with the ‘dead conscience’ sucker you are! Kudos from Bentonville and the multi-billionaire Waltons.

Perhaps a candlelight vigil at 182nd and Powell with ghost dancing by yourself will make you feel better.

SanDiegoView in vantress's wallet
Thursday, December 13 at 06:14 AM

The thread quotes Guitierrez:Protectionism doesn’t protect"-Well apparently neither has the FDA.CPSC, FEMA, NTSB, INS,EPA-shall I continue??

ddrb in
Thursday, December 13 at 10:51 AM

ddrb,

Are you saying that Large liberal (progressive) government programs and agencies aren’t protecting us?  Isn’t it funny that America survived an thrived, before these agencies existed?

RDS in
Thursday, December 13 at 11:45 AM

RDS: I’m saying that these government groups,most particularly in the past 8 years have been neutered as to their effectiveness. In an effort to create the illusion of smaller government,and also to cripple many agencies, so that corporate interests can come in and get the contracts. For example the Blackwater group,Halliburton,GAO hiring outside firms to do paperwork-the list goes on. Having only one toy inspector at the government consumers lab-now they want companies to HIRE their own inspectors-and don’t tell me that’s making more jobs-these are more often than not, no-bid-going to the interests of campaign contributors, and are limited in number of employees.We’ve seen the bitter fruit of Blackwater,and the current KBR rape scandal-this all from a conservative administration.

ddrb in
Thursday, December 13 at 12:04 PM

Kudos to that ddrb!  I couldn’t agree more.  Hell, these no-bid contractors even got to profit from Katrina!

Corgishepmom in Irrigon, OR
Friday, December 14 at 01:46 AM

Commenting is not available in this content entry.

Comment Policy

WalmartWatch.com reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to remove or refuse to post blog comments.