Fact Sheets

The Employee Free Choice Act Legislation that will truly make a difference for Wal-Mart workers

Wage & Hour Issues Read how Wal-Mart continually fails to pay every worker for every hour worked

Health Care Wal-Mart's still insures barely over half its employees on the company plan

Always Low Wages Poverty-level wages make life extremely difficult for Wal-Mart's 1.4 million workers

The Environment How Wal-Mart's business model is detrimental for our planet

Wal-Mart Set to take $470,000 from brain-damaged former employee Deborah Shank

When we first heard about Wal-Mart’s plan to sue former employee Deborah Shank for the money the company spent on her health care, we did everything we could to raise awareness and help her out. After a near-fatal collision with a semi-truck, Deborah was brain-damaged in need of permanent full-time care. Now, Wal-Mart is poised to leave her penniless too.

It takes Wal-Mart less than 38 seconds to earn the $470,000 its suing the Shanks for. For a family dealing with a debilitating injury, however, that’s a small fortune. The company has recently lauded its new employee health care plan, but cases like Deborah Shanks’ show that Wal-Mart’s priorities lie only in its bottom line, without regard for its employees’ well being.

But there’s still time for Wal-Mart to do the right thing. The Wal-Mart Foundation, The Employee Fund, the Walton Family Foundation, or CEO Lee Scott personally- could all chip in to reimburse Mrs. Shank, doing the right thing by a hard-working former employee and saving their company a lot of bad publicity.

(Indeed, Wal-Mart Watch sent official letters to all three foundations asking they consider matching the amount we raised in an online fundraiser. We received responses from none.)

The Shank story remains a tragedy regardless, but action from Wal-Mart would be better late than never. If ever there was a Wal-Mart employee who deserved a little help, it’s Deborah Shank.

Brain-damaged ex-worker must pay $470,000 to Wal-Mart [St. Louis Post-Tribune (Mo.)]

The family of a Missouri woman must reimburse Wal-Mart for nearly a half-million dollars in medical expenses now that the U.S. Supreme Court has refused to review her case.

The court on Monday let stand a ruling by the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis requiring Debbie Shank of Cape Girardeau County to pay nearly $470,000 to Wal-Mart.

The appeal was the last legal recourse for the family of the 52-year-old Shank, a mother of three who was critically injured in a car accident eight years ago. She suffered a brain injury that took her memory and left her with very little ability to move or communicate. She has lived in a nursing home since she was released from the hospital.

“It’s been kind of hard on us,” Nathan Shank, Debbie Shank’s 17-year-old son, said Monday when told about the court’s decision.

Nathan Shank said that with her case in limbo, his mother already had lost a private caregiver and might be moved out of her private room in the nursing home.

According to legal documents, Shank’s medical bills — totaling $469,216 — were covered by a health insurance program at Wal-Mart, where Shank worked nights stocking shelves.

Her family later settled a lawsuit with the trucking company whose driver was involved in the accident. After attorneys’ fees and expenses, $417,477 was put in a trust for Shank’s care. That settlement money, plus $51,739 that Shank will have to pay out of pocket, must be paid to Wal-Mart.

As is common for employer-sponsored health plans, Shank’s insurance required full repayment of medical expenses if she received money from a lawsuit.

Daphne Moore, a Wal-Mart spokeswoman, said the company sued “out of fairness to everyone who contributes” to the plan.

“This is a tragic situation,” Moore said. “The reality is that the health plan is required to protect its assets so that it can pay future claims for other associates and their family members.”

The Supreme Court gave no explanation for its decision.

Posted by Media Team on Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Click Here for a Printer-Friendly Version

COMMENTS

With proper publicity this could be the Terri Schiavo moment for Walmart. That is, the action that is so heartless and self serving that it just turns people off from the store (or the GOP, in the original case).

The one argument that Walmart has used that might even sound plausible “we owe it to our stockholders” to recover the money, goes out the window when it is set beside donating to charities. How does this help their stockholders?

Well in one case the charity (forgiving the judgment) goes to an individual with nothing to offer in return. In the other case the money goes to a foundation affiliated with a woman who may soon be president, or at least will remain a powerful senator.

The crassness of the calculation is breathtaking. I’m sure a clever graphic artist could get the message across in a poster or quick video. How about it?

robertdfeinman in Long Island, NY
Wednesday, March 19 at 02:51 PM

robertdfeinman:"The crassness of the calculation is breathtaking."Indeed it is ,sir,but not unexpected,for those who are familiar with the history of this corporation’s patterns and practices towards its employees.Could this meet the criteria for a Human Rights violation?

ddrb in
Wednesday, March 19 at 03:31 PM

how cold and cruel, these insurance companies are a joke and are only in business to take your money invest it and make money the first time you file a claim against them even if it has been twenty years your rates rise and you may even be dropped. as a union member this is why i advise my children and family not to shop at this store

pamela in st.louis missouri
Thursday, March 20 at 06:54 PM

Outrageous, what should and can Americans do about it?

Moe in San Diego
Friday, March 28 at 03:55 PM

My prayers are with the Shank’s family.  And I pray our Lord opens the eyes, hearts, and pocketbooks of Wal-mart’s unlimited resources which our Lord has provided to help the Shank’s family.

Monica in New Mexico
Saturday, March 29 at 12:09 AM

This is beyond outrageous.  Why isn’t Walmart DONATING to help this employee?  I worked for a privately owned, well known company (think diet shakes).  I was in a car accident, and my employer provided health insurance paid for all of my medical bills.  I sued the motorist who caused the accident, and got a settlement that was a nice number.  My employer would not subrogate to receive the medical benefits back!  They were nice guys who did the right thing.  And I sustained serious injuries, but was in no way diabled for the rest of my life.  There is mention of an online fundraiser on this site.  Where is it located?  I am even thinking of a website just to collect money for this poor woman.  God help her.

Elizabeth Frederick in Hobe Sound, FL
Sunday, March 30 at 05:52 PM

I can not believe I just saw this I swear form this day on I will never step foot in Wall Mart again it floors me that they would do something like this. What a waste of a company

Jim Murphy in Gladstone Mo
Monday, March 31 at 02:52 AM

Commenting is not available in this content entry.

Comment Policy

WalmartWatch.com reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to remove or refuse to post blog comments.