Wal-Mart to Face New Jersey Class-Action Pay Suit

[From Bloomberg News]

Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the world’s largest retailer, must face a class-action lawsuit by New Jersey workers claiming the company forced them to work through breaks and cheated them of overtime pay, the state Supreme Court ruled.

The decision today reversed two lower-court rulings that denied the hourly workers the right to sue as a group. The trial court “abused its discretion in declining to certify” the class action, the court said. The high court certified a class covering about 72,000 former and current Wal-Mart workers. One legal expert said the decision “isn’t good news for Wal-Mart.”

“My speculation is that a jury is likely to find for the plaintiffs, given New Jersey juries and the pretty strong evidence put on elsewhere,’’ said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond in Virginia.

Wal-Mart, based in Bentonville, Arkansas, faces more than 70 U.S. wage-and-hour suits, including class actions by employees claiming the company failed to pay for all hours worked or didn’t compensate them properly for overtime.

Since December 2005, juries in Pennsylvania and California have awarded Wal-Mart workers a total of $251 million in pay and damages over such claims.

“We’re disappointed with the decision and we’re studying the opinion,’’ Wal-Mart spokesman John Simley said.

Workers’ attorney Judy Spanier said her clients were ``very pleased’’ with the decision. ``It essentially adopts every argument we made,’’ she said.

Two Courts Reversed

The ruling sends the case back to state court in New Brunswick for pretrial evidence-gathering.

The trial court first refused to grant class-action status, saying the case would be unmanageable. A midlevel appeals court upheld the decision. The Supreme Court found both lower courts were in error.

“By denying shelter to an alleged wrongdoing defendant, we deter similar transgressions against an otherwise vulnerable class,’’ the court in Trenton said in a 5-1 decision.

“We find that common questions of law and fact predominate over individualized questions and that the class-action device is superior to other available methods,’’ the court said. It didn’t rule on the merit of the workers’ claims.

The workers claim Wal-Mart forced them to work through meal breaks, locked them in retail stores after they clocked out and coerced them into working off the clock. The company broke state wage and hour laws and breached contracts with employees, the workers say.

The company operates 44 Wal-Mart stores, one Wal-Mart Supercenter and nine Sam’s Club in New Jersey, the court said. The class will cover current and former hourly employees from May 30, 1996, to the present.

Wal-Mart shares rose 48 cents to $47.60 at 1:50 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading.

The case is Iliadis v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., A-69-06, New Jersey Supreme Court (Trenton).

To contact the reporter on this story: Margaret Cronin Fisk in Southfield, Michigan, at .

Posted by Web Team on Thursday, May 31, 2007

Click Here for a Printer-Friendly Version

COMMENTS

...about 72,000 former and current Wal-Mart workers...

72,000 on this one, 10,000 black truckers, and 1.6 million women...no one can turn out disgruntled employees like Wal-Mart!

Ken V in Texas
Thursday, May 31 at 02:10 PM

Ken

These lawsuits are complete scams and you know it. I have seen firsthand the Wal-Mart policies regarding breaks and overtime and I have shopped at no less than a dozen Wal-Marts and three Sam’s Clubs. I have asked these questions everywhere, in casual conversation with my cashier. To a person, they all said that they have a computer code in the system and the system automatically locks them out when it is time for their break or their quitting time. I have been in line when the cashier was locked out and had to have the CS manager send another cashier to take over the register. I have seen it in person. These lawsuits come from 3 or 4 disgruntled employees who had poor employment records. They could never survive cross examination in court so they round up people who share a similar trait (location, gender, race, etc.) and push a mass tort suit.

If you wonder why employers move jobs offshore, you have one of your major answers here.

Nick in
Thursday, May 31 at 06:14 PM

“These lawsuits are complete scams...”
Nick in- denial again about court judgements against WalMart and of course all the evidence presented in court cases all around the United States finding WalMart guilty.

“Since December 2005, juries in Pennsylvania and California have awarded Wal-Mart workers a total of $251 million in pay and damages over such claims.

Quit your bawling Nick. WalMart reaps what it sows in these court verdicts against them. WalMart can always make up the losses by constructing some other way to screw over the ‘associates’.

“If you wonder why employers move jobs offshore, you have one of your major answers here.”
Nick evading the real reason.

Chinese average manufacturing wage $.35 per hour.

WalMart- ‘Living wage’? “Family wage’? ‘Health care benefits’? We don’t understand. And we don’t want to either. The Walton billionaires thank you for your poverty!

SanDiegoView in
Thursday, May 31 at 07:02 PM

...and you know it.

I know nothing of the kind. I don’t pretend to be a lawyer but from what I’ve seen Dukes has a case. I don’t know about these others, but this much I do know; win, lose, or draw, this isn’t going to be good for Wal-Mart.

If you wonder why employers move jobs offshore, you have one of your major answers here.

Having to adhere to our labor laws is another.

Ken V in Texas
Thursday, May 31 at 07:02 PM

that clock out time is for cashiers only. They can work anyone
off the clock.  The clockout is for lunch break and quiting time
only not 15 min breaks. Nick just because you shop at wm
.doesn’t mean you know anything about wm.

bb in
Friday, June 01 at 03:56 AM

Commenting is not available in this content entry.

Comment Policy

WalmartWatch.com reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to remove or refuse to post blog comments.