Latest Headlines
Wal-Mart Watch In Depth
The inaugural issue of Wal-Mart Watch’s issue brief, In Depth, focuses on gender discrimination at Wal-Mart and the massive class action lawsuit female employees are waging against the company.
From the cover story:
On February 6, 2007, The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, ruled that Wal-Mart must face a class action lawsuit of 1.6 million female workers who are alleging that they were discriminated against in pay and promotions.
An overview of gender discrimination at Wal-Mart, an interview with one of the lead plaintiffs in the landmark case Dukes v. Wal-Mart, news reports and facts about discrimination at Wal-Mart are just some of the items included in this first issue.
- Click here (PDF) to read the Spring 2007 issue of Wal-Mart Watch In Depth.
Posted by Alex Goldschmidt on Monday, February 12, 2007
Click Here for a Printer-Friendly Version
SEARCH WAL-MART WATCH
Most Popular Tags
battlefield benefits brookins chicago city council competition competitors daily clips debate development doctor employees expansion government health care healthcare hearing influence insurance jobs mandate new politics residents senate target wall street journal wildernessTop Posts
- Happy 4th of July, From Your Friends at Wal-Mart Watch
- Today’s Final Word on Health Care
- Wall Street Journal Takes Wal-Mart to the Woodshed
- Wal-Mart: Sticks and Stones May Break Our Bones, But Health Care Could Kill Our Rivals
- Ald. Brookins Won’t Give Up on Second Wal-Mart Store, Ups Pressure on City Council
- Final Hearing Date Set in Wilderness Standoff
- Wal-Mart Watch Daily Clips- July 1st 2009
- Wal-Mart, U.S. Chamber Oppose Labor Rules in Pakistan and Afghanistan
- Workers Speak Out: Despite Calls for Reform, Wal-Mart Still Shortchanging Workers on Health Care
- Wal-Mart Says: ‘Hasta La Vista’ Union Supporters
Archive
Subscribe to this blog
Subscribe to the Wal-Mart Watch RSS Feed
![]()







View Wal-Mart Watch's videos on YouTube
Contact Us
Have a tip? Contact us.









COMMENTS
What a gross waste of money for the union workers, whose dues help support this site. Read the report, what is new?
knowledgeable in
Monday, February 12 at 04:01 PM
Thanks to the webmaster for removing my post
knowledgeable in
Tuesday, February 13 at 12:34 AM
There had been two different posts on here that were deleted.
knowledgeable in
Tuesday, February 13 at 07:25 PM
I would like to see the women win.
I believe that it is long passed time that Wal-Mart
take responsibility for it’s own mistakes, not only
in the Dukes gender discrimination case, but
also in any, and all other, types of legal cases
against this corporation.
Rob in Surfside Beach, SC
Tuesday, February 20 at 04:14 PM
Comment Policy
WalmartWatch.com reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to remove or refuse to post blog comments.