Wal-Mart Watch Report: “Work at Your Own Risk”
Wal-Mart Watch today released a new report on the retail giant’s workers’ inadequate workers’ compensation program that exposes serious risks to both its workers and the public. The report, titled “Work At Your Own Risk,” highlights ways Wal-Mart puts the health of their employees as risk while shifting the burden of caring for its on-the-job injured employees onto the taxpayer. It explains how Wal-Mart, the United States’ largest private employer, has a track record of difficulty in complying with state workers’ compensation laws, while putting its employees’ health in jeopardy. The study examines seven state case studies that have ramifications for the company’s operations in all 50 states. Key examples include:
- In 2001, the State of Washington Department of Labor and Industries made the unprecedented move of threatening to seize control of Wal-Mart’s entire injured worker program, after the company showed itself “unwilling or unable to manage its workers’ compensation program as required by law.” A decertification case ultimately was settled, but Wal-Mart is prohibited from self-administering its workers’ compensation program claims in Washington until 2010.
- In 2004, Maine amended the state’s Workers’ Compensation Act and began tracking workers’ compensation payments and claims challenges, finding Wal-Mart’s challenging of workers’ compensation claims was “off the charts.”
- Class action was filed in 2007 in Oklahoma for retaliation against employees who filed workers’ compensation claims. The charges include cutting hours, transferring employees to less desirable positions, and termination. There are over 30,000 people employed by Wal-Mart in Oklahoma.
- Individual stories reflect a policy, whether formal or informal, of fighting claims regardless of validity, and delaying payments as long as possible. The result is an increase in the number of employees forced onto federal and state programs to pay for treatment and subsidize lost wages, effectively shifting the cost of compensation workers away from Wal-Mart and onto taxpayers.
Click here to read the full report.
Posted by Alex Goldschmidt on Thursday, June 28, 2007
Click Here for a Printer-Friendly Version







COMMENTS
NEEDS TO BE DONE IN OHIO !
AMOS in
Thursday, June 28 at 03:45 PM
A (((tip))) of the Anti Wal-Mart tin foil hat to the crack research team at WMW. I’ve done enough independent research to see you guys do a bang-up job.
Ken V in Texas
Friday, June 29 at 04:05 AM
I Second Ken’s Sentiments!
According to the full report, “Wisconsin enacted the first workers’ compensation law in 1911...”
Where is Fighting Bob LaFollette when you need him?
ScrewedbyWal-Mart in Anytown, America
Friday, June 29 at 06:28 AM
Also needs to be done in South Carolina.
Several fellow associates in my store received on the job
injuries over the past few years, are still under medical
care, and do not have workers’ compensation.
We need all the help we can get.
Rob in Surfside Beach, SC
Friday, June 29 at 11:17 AM
Most States differ in their Workmen’s Compensation laws.
You can’t take the above as gospel for all the states.
Usually, the state mandates that an employer has insurance with a carrier to cover workmens comp. You are then audited upon the gross amount of payroll. The problem on here is that so many post with very limited knowledge.
This is not to say that for some it takes time to get the claim processed, due to many factors, primarily lawyers. Yes companies including WM fight these claims to keep insurance rates down. The above article is not completely fair.
The Sage in
Friday, June 29 at 01:02 PM
Another Pro Wal-Mart Troll Heard From
Thank you Sage for your useless 2 cents. Now be a good troll and go back under your bridge and play with RDS and Nick.
ScrewedbyWal-Mart in Anytown, America
Friday, June 29 at 01:13 PM
Screwed
I hate to deal in name calling and personal insults but you bring out the worst in me. You are an absolute loser. You deal in lies, slander and cowardly personal attacks when an intelligent subject is being discussed. Is it because you can’t understand the argument or because you know that logic and fact do not support your point of view?
You have yet to post anything of redeeming value. You have contributed nothing to any of our discussions. You are a negative person who has nothing worthwhile to add. You cannot discuss reality and you spend all your time insulting those who are attempting to maintain at least a modicum of intelligent conversation.
If you can’t follow our discussions, why don’t you at least listen and learn? Pick up an economics book, go to a website that teaches you about capitalism, read a history of business in the US. Better yet, take a tour of the world and see how poor other nations really are and you will appreciate the wealth and comfort we have here in the US. Even our poor people live better than the middle class in Europe!
I realize, Tom Boese, that you are bitter because nobody watched your hack film. Get used to it. There are thousands of film school graduates who probably could not convince anyone to watch their garbage. You are not alone.
It is my hope that you come away with something from my rant. Perhaps you can get yourself an education and become a better person. Then you can contribute to our discussions. Notice I didn’t say you had to agree with me on anything. If someone else has a logical, reasoned, factual point that makes more sense, I will acknowledge that and accept it. I don’t have all the answers. But I do have intelligence, reason, curiosity to learn new things, an open mind and no ego. I want to learn. I read everyday. I want to better myself. I don’t take my frustrations out on people who post on a blog!
Good luck to you, Screwed. Perhaps you can even tell us, at some point, just how, exactly, you were “screwed” by Wal-Mart.
Thanks.
Nick in
Saturday, June 30 at 07:54 AM
To “Screwed by”
I don’t know if you have ever been in a business required by law to carry workmen’s comp ins., if you did you would understand the veracity of my post.
I though you had posted one time that you were still working at Wal-Mart, however with all the advantages they give women in business, you should start a company. Then see if they give you a better deal on insurance as a woman contractor. WM does not set the state statutes.
The Sage in
Saturday, June 30 at 11:02 AM
Perhaps you can even tell us...
What is with this editorial “we” and “us”? As the saying goes: Have you got a mouse in your pocket? Just who are you presuming to speak for, Nick? I know you don’t speak for everyone because you don’t speak for me.
As for judging the style/content of other posters, I think the adage ‘people that live in glass houses’ applies here. If your posts contained all the attributes you find lacking in Screwed’s stuff, you and I would be on the same page, and we’re not!
**Take note, Mary. This ‘we’ stuff applies to you as well.
Ken V in Texas
Sunday, July 01 at 06:13 AM
No problem Ken. Seeing your theories on how Walmart should be run absolutely leads me to say i don’t think you and I would ever be considered a “we”.
Mary in
Sunday, July 01 at 08:39 AM
Seeing your theories on how Walmart should be run....
What fault do you find with expecting competence from people paid millions per year?
Ken V in Texas
Sunday, July 01 at 12:51 PM
I’ll go on record and say while noboby speaks for me I will add this from an observer’s point of view:
I stand with Nick, Mary, and RDS on much of what they have to say, as Nick and Mary have a pretty good grasp of ECON 101, and RDS speaks from the “been there/done that” point of view, which carries much more weight than the opinions of a bunch of people who have some sort of axe to grind with Wal-Mart, of all things.
In closing, for those who are still lurking in the shadows observing, ask yourself how could anyone possibly take someone who has a hell-bent agenda (e.g., Screwed and Ken V in Texas) seriously?
Cheers,
Bill
2.
Bill in
Sunday, July 01 at 01:00 PM
...ask yourself how could anyone possibly take someone who has a hell-bent agenda (e.g., Screwed and Ken V in Texas) seriously?
I dunno, Bill, but they do.
:o)
It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it. ~ Upton Sinclair
Ken V in Texas
Monday, July 02 at 03:40 AM
Ken V.
You quoted Upton Sinclair. Is that your attempt to explain why you post the way you do? Are you paid by WMW?
Big T in Rogers
Monday, July 02 at 01:27 PM
Are you paid by WMW?
No, not by WMW.
I know value and Wal-Mart doesn’t meet my qualifications. ~ Ed Witlen
Ken V in Texas
Tuesday, July 03 at 05:35 AM
Ken V,
“No, not by WMW.”
How about the UFCW or SEIU?
RDS in
Tuesday, July 03 at 11:04 AM
How about the UFCW or SEIU?
Nope and...nope.
I know it puts a serious crack in your world view, guys, but I’m not pro union. I’m not anti union either. Let’s just say I’m ambivalent. I post here because they are kind enough to provide a forum, but beyond that I fall back on the Arab proverb:
The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Ken V in Texas
Tuesday, July 03 at 02:06 PM
Gee Ken, What’s Next?
“The enemy of my enemy is my friend.”
The next thing you’ll be telling us is that you’re really Osama bin Laden. :o)
Isn’t this pretty much the tactic the U.S. likes to use? We thought Osama was an alright dude when he was fighting those “evil” Russians. Of course we also thought Saddam Hussein was OK as long as he was fighting the Iranians.
ScrewedbyWal-Mart in Anytown, America
Tuesday, July 03 at 04:01 PM
http://2369019ce39f6323980fe931a1e7cfef-t.fyneuo.org 2369019ce39f6323980fe931a1e7cfef http://2369019ce39f6323980fe931a1e7cfef-b1.fyneuo.org 2369019ce39f6323980fe931a1e7cfef http://2369019ce39f6323980fe931a1e7cfef-b3.fyneuo.org bc7f62bdb79a44270357aea08a06217e
August in Braulio
Wednesday, July 11 at 05:50 AM
Comment Policy
WalmartWatch.com reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to remove or refuse to post blog comments.