Check out this week’s issue of the Wal-Mart Watch Weekly Update for Elected Officials – a compilation of Wal-Mart news from across the country and beyond.
This week’s issue begins with a new study from the group Good Jobs First, which reveals that cash-strapped states are forgoing a total of roughly $1 billion annually in tax revenue because of little-noticed laws that permit retailers to keep a slice of the sales taxes they collect for the government. In fact, the study finds thirteen states do not cap the amount that a retailer can receive as vendor compensation for collecting sales tax, resulting in millions of lost tax dollars.
A large focus this week is also on Wal-Mart’s announcement that Lee Scott will step down as CEO in February 2009, to be replaced by Michael Duke, Wal-Mart’s Vice Chairman of its International Division. In addition to the CEO change, you’ll find stories on the battle over the Employee Free Choice Act, how Wal-Mart will deal with the Obama Administration from a labor perspective, and related news on Wal-Mart’s labor battles in Canada.
And finally, check out our “Stateside” and “Wal-Mart International” sections to find out what’s going on with Wal-Mart around the country and across the globe. Wal-Mart has founded a new consumer group in New England geared towards fighting Wal-Mart opponents, and has purchased its own wind-energy supply based out of Odessa, Texas
Wal-Mart Watch Weekly Update for Elected Officials [November 21, 2008]
Posted by Corey Himrod | Permalink
The Saskatchewan Labour Relations Board (SLRB) has agreed to hear a complaint by the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW Canada) accusing Wal-Mart of engaging in unfair labor practices as defined by Saskatchewan law. What’s more, the SLRB has ruled that Wal-Mart’s actions outside the province of Saskatchewan can be taken into account in assessing whether it is engaging in unfair labor actions within the province.
This means that the SLRB can take into account the example of Jonquiere, Quebec, when ruling on UFCW Canada’s complaint. It was in that small town, just over 100 miles north of Quebec City, that Wal-Mart announced it was going to shut its doors after workers voted to make the Jonquiere store the first unionized Wal-Mart in North America. The closure put 190 employees out of work, served as a warning for workers at other Wal-Mart stores who may have considered unionization against the company’s wishes.
Board chair James Seibel said the board was not required to determine whether Wal-Mart had acted illegally in Quebec to consider whether its actions “intimidated employees in Saskatchewan” from exercising their right under the province’s Trade Union Act to “organize and be represented by a bargaining agent of their choosing.”
“The fact that the actions of Wal-Mart upon which the allegations are based were committed outside the geographic confines of Saskatchewan does not mean that they cannot constitute (a) violation of the restriction on intimidation of its employees in the province,” Seibel ruled.
As the UFCW Canada complaint moves forward in Saskatchewan, it will be interesting to see if Wal-Mart’s actions in Quebec play a significant role - the company’s labor issues have yet to fade away there. According to the National Union of Public and General Employees:
The ruling is the latest in a series of setbacks for Wal-Mart in Canada. The company recently shut down a second operation in Quebec – a tire and lube shop in Gatineau – after failing to stop a union contract from being imposed there. Meanwhile, a Supreme Court of Canada case arising from the Jonquiere closure is scheduled to be heard within months.
We’ll keep you posted.
Read the rest of this story ...
Posted by Corey Himrod | Permalink
Time to pull that roll of aluminum foil out of the pantry, because they’re after us, and they want our braaainnns…
Or so says Jerry Rose, one of our neighbors to the north in British Columbia, who has filed one of the more bizarre lawsuits I have seen in some time. Rose is after $2 billion in damages from Microsoft, Telus, Wal-Mart, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (among others) for the usual list of charges: mind control, satanism, and witchcraft. We’ll look around and see if we can get a copy of his complaint, but according to the National Post:
Mr. Rose’s claim states “that he has been subject to invasive brain computer interface technology, research, experiments, field studies and surgery” and also named the University of B.C. and the B.C. College of Physicians and Surgeons as defendants.
Not to be outdone, an attorney for Microsoft assured the judge that there is in fact no scientific evidence that mind control is possible, although anyone that has been forced to watch a Sarah Palin rally may beg to differ. We’re not sure what role Wal-Mart has played in all of this, but if I had to guess, witchcraft would be my bet.
Judge Fraser Wilson, while calling the case unusual, has said he will need to be convinced there is nothing in Rose’s claim that could not be litigated before he dismisses it.
B.C. judge hears $2B lawsuit against Microsoft, Wal-Mart over brain control [CanWest News Service]
Read the rest of this story ...
Posted by Corey Himrod | Permalink
BloggingStock’s Brian White doesn’t always share our viewpoint on Wal-Mart, but this week’s “Wal-Mart Weekly” column is particularly interesting. It focuses entirely on the closing of the Tire & Lube Express in Gatineau, Quebec.
It’s a good column, and not just because it gets in a few zings at Wal-Mart. It’s one of the first pieces we’ve seen that begins to take a real look at Wal-Mart’s repeated decisions to close stores rather than deal with unions and union contracts, and asks important questions from a business perspective. Is this a good policy for Wal-Mart as a company? Is the repeated antagonism of workers who unionize going to hurt Wal-Mart’s growth potential in countries like Canada and China - where unions are more powerful and prevalent? And more fundamentally - is Wal-Mart’s bare-bones-wage model really a sustainable and profitable business plan in an economy where living costs are skyrocketing?
If you’ve got time, read the whole thing:
The Wal-Mart Weekly: Is closing up a unionized shop the best strategy? [BloggingStocks]
This week, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: WMT) closed the first shop in North America that had been completely unionized. Does this signal anything to other Wal-Mart locations that form a collective bargaining organization? Sure: form one and the retailer would rather see the operation shut down entirely instead of having employees with any kind of power.
That may sound harsh, but it has to be the feeling around a Wal-Mart tire and lube shop in Gatineau, Quebec, which was literally closed due to its unionization last week. What better a way to leave consumers in the lurch than to close up shop on something that brings in revenue even if its employees decide to stray from Wal-Mart’s “non-union” stance in its retail locations.
Was the closing really the best answer?With the Gatineau location in Canada the first official Wal-Mart location with an actual union contract in place, Wal-Mart’s response could be seen as severe. Was the global retailer trying to get a message out to any other Wal-Mart location in North America—“unionize and we will shut your doors?” If so, that’s no way to run a business, right? Is Wal-Mart so afraid of unions in its stores that it would rather shut them down (or pieces of them) instead of continuing to operate?
Lisette Wallingford, a frustrated customer of the Gatineau shop, expressed her disappointment: “They told me to come back today because my tires were coming in ... I think I’ll go to Canadian Tire because I can count on them.” There’s all we need to know: a frustrated customer. Wal-Mart was at least kind enough to direct customers late last week to other Gatineau-area Wal-Mart locations, with no mentioning that the closed location was due to unionization. Nice.
Read the rest of this story ...
Posted by Media Team | Permalink
Wal-Mart doesn’t have a bank yet in the U.S., but that isn’t stopping ‘em from forging full-steam ahead in Canada and Mexico.
In classic shrewd fashion, Wal-Mart seems to be using the financial crisis and the credit crunch to its advantage. Today’s story in PR Week isn’t the first to imply that Wal-Mart’s application for a bank in Canada might be “received favourably” by officials in a weak economy.
The story also noted for the umpteenth time that:
Wal-Mart Canada did not return calls for comment. In its notice, the retailer did not disclose what kind of banking services it would provide, but it is expected to offer credit card, mortgage, and investment products.
Meanwhile, a Bloomberg News story today tells us that Wal-Mex’s bank is growing. Wal-Mart de Mexico SAB is charging ahead south of the border and planning to unload 100,000 credit cards on Mexicans, targeting primarily the 75 percent of the population who’ve never had a bank account.
Issuing more credit cards as Mexico’s economy slows would allow Walmex, as the company is known, to collect annual interest of as high as 75 percent and encourage purchases of more expensive appliances and furniture at its stores, the only place the cards can be used. Walmex is preparing more financial products aimed at customers who have never had a bank account, about 75 percent of Mexico’s 103 million people.
In case you missed that: Wal-Mart is encouraging Mexicans to go in debt at 75 percent interest.
Presumably, Wal-Mart is trying to set up working bank operations in Canada and Mexico before trying again to apply in the U.S. And now they seem to be using the financial crisis as another tool to get into the banking game.
They certainly can’t expect us to keep quiet about any it.
Posted by Eric Bull | Permalink
Well, my faithful blog readers, after two years of working on Wal-Mart issues and more than a year as the main editor of this blog, our Friday Blog Round-Up today will be my last post. I hope you all continue reading, commenting and working to challenge Wal-Mart’s business practices. Enjoy the writing of my Wal-Mart Watch colleagues and try to keep the infighting to a minimum. As for now - on to the week’s blogs!
BLOGGERS WEIGH IN ON “EMPLOYEES SPEAK OUT”
Real Voices, Some More Wild Stuff [Working Life]
Wal-Mart Watch has set up a website where you can actually hear and read about the actual workers who have to put up with the oppressive behavior of The Beast. This is part of the picture: the Great Robbery that we have all endured for a number of decades--wages not going up (even though productivity goes up), no health care, no pensions--plays out, day-to-day, in those aisles at Wal-Mart.
The voice of the workers (Part 1) [Writing on the Wal]
What you get there is a look behind Walmart’s PR curtain to see what employees are really thinking, but too afraid to tell their supervisors since they don’t have a union to protect them. Indeed, let’s start this series there, in the category that Wal-Mart Watch calls corporate culture.
After the jump, union-busting in Canada, bottle water, Nike’s suit against the Bentonville behemoth and Sarah Palin.
Read the rest of this story ...
Posted by Alex Goldschmidt | Permalink
Wal-Mart Canada shuts another location after workers unionize [Marketwire]
The closure of a unionized Wal-Mart Tire and Lube Express in Gatineau, Quebec “is another attack on its workers, on the community, and one more example of its blatant disregard for Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms,” says Wayne Hanley, the National President of UFCW Canada.
“Wal-Mart thinks a cheap oil change is more important than the Canadian constitution.”
Wal-Mart Canada announced Thursday that it was shutting the Gatineau outlet because a union contract, which came into force in August, didn’t fit with its business model. It is the second time Wal-Mart has shut a Quebec outlet after its workers decided to form a union.
In April 2005 Wal-Mart shut its store in Jonquiere, Quebec and terminated more than 200 workers just as binding arbitration for a first-contract was set to begin. Later this year the Supreme Court will hear arguments that the shutting of the Jonquiere store was a violation of those workers’ rights.
In June 2007 the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that under the Charter’s Freedom of Association protections, workers in Canada are guaranteed the right to organize for the purposes of collective bargaining, “but once again Wal-Mart has proven the only rules it respects are its own, “ said Hanley.
“For Wal-Mart to say its employees are free to unionize, but then declare that a contract produced through mediation just doesn’t work for their business model, means as far as Wal-Mart is concerned, the rights of its American shareholders are more important than the human rights of its workers in Canada.”
“Now it is up to the Supreme Court to tell Wal-Mart that it is not above the law and that it must respect the rights of workers to organize and bargain collectively.”
Posted by Alex Goldschmidt | Permalink
No matter how many times Wal-Mart fails to create a “Bank of Wal-Mart,” the company always seems to find a way to bring it back to life.
Seven months ago, we helped keep Wal-Mart out of the banking business. But now, the Federal Reserve is looking into changing the rules completely - and may throw open the door to giant corporations like Wal-Mart to run their own banks.
At a time when our economy is already in crisis, we can’t turn the banking industry over to Wal-Mart. Please write a note to Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and the Banking Committee leaders in Congress, and let them know what’s at stake:
http://action.walmartwatch.com/NoBankofWalmart
Read the rest of this story ...
Posted by David Nassar, Executive Director | Permalink
After getting shut down in U.S., Wal-Mart looks to lock up the other 2/3 of the continent by getting a bank permit in Canada.
Saturday, Wal-Mart posted its mandatory public notice of its official bank application to the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions. The bank would theoretically be based in Mississauga, Ontario, but there’s no real timeline yet or any indication if the same opposition that rose quickly in the U.S. to block Wal-Mart’s bank will arise in Canada.
So what does it all really mean?
Several analysts have said so far that Wal-Mart’s entry in banking wouldn’t pose a huge threat to the Canadian banking establishment - in the near future, at least. Wal-Mart Stores already offer financial services like money transfers and cash withdrawals, but a banking license would allow the company to greatly expand what it offers. Spokesman Kevin Groh cited credit cards as an immediate first step for Wal-Mart, but also listed as possibilities “savings accounts, loans, mortgages, RSPs, GICs...”
The consensus, at least as of now, appears to be that Wal-Mart’s focus is still retail-based: rather than targeting the Canadian banking sector, it’s targeting other retailers by using the new offerings to pull in more customers and squeeze more dollars out existing store customers. (Wal-Mart Canada Andrew Pelletier said that the company doesn’t plan to open up traditional bank branches “for the foreseeable future”...)
As Wal-Mart tries to furiously expand and eat more market share in Canada, this is an edge it seems desperate for.
The Holy Grail for Wal-Mart, of course, is a bank in U.S. They’ll no doubt try again, but for now Wal-Mart will have to settle on our neighbors to the South and (they hope) North.
Wal-Mart Canadian Unit Seeks to Offer Bank Services [Bloomberg News]:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the world’s biggest retailer, applied to the Canadian government for official bank status that would allow it to expand financial services in the country.
Wal-Mart’s Canadian unit has applied to the minister of finance to establish a bank under the name Wal-Mart Canada Bank and, in French, La Banque Wal-Mart du Canada, according to a notice posted Sept. 13 on the Canadian government’s Web site.
Read the rest of this story ...
Posted by Eric Bull | Permalink
Wal-Mart Canada has faced some big labor problems lately. A 2005 lawsuit against the company’s anti-union labor practices made it to the Canadian Supreme Court this month, and at almost the same time workers in a Wal-Mart garage in Gatineau, Quebec managed to unionze, much to the company’s chagrin. So the company’s PR department did what it does best: divert attention.
David Cheesewright, CEO of Wal-Mart Canada, announced today that all of the company’s new Canadian stores will be “energy efficient.” The retailer has yet to meet any independent guidelines for energy efficiency, so its environmental claims are somewhat unclear, but the announcement comes at a time when Wal-Mart Canada could use some serious public relations karma.
Cheesewright insisted that the efficiency improvements were simply cost-saving measures, and said “environmental sustainability and business sustainability—it’s the same thing.” However, the company has yet to announce any such measures for its U.S. stores - or its stores in any other country, for that matter. The number of “energy efficient” Wal-Mart stores remains a pitifully small percentage of the company’s total operations. So if Cheesewright’s statements are true, Wal-Mart is missing out on a lot of cost savings - and we all know Wal-Mart wouldn’t do a thing like that. Perhaps the retailer is actually just looking for some free PR among our neighbors to the north.
Wal-Mart aims for ‘greenest stores on the block’ [Financial Post (Canada)]
Wal-Mart Canada Corp. pushed its green agenda ahead Tuesday by pledging that all new stores will be built to be markedly more energy efficient, and existing stores will be retrofitted to make them more environmentally friendly.
“Wal-Mart Canada (WMT/NYSE) has been intensely dedicated to environmental sustainability over the past three years,” Wal-Mart Canada CEO David Cheesewright said at the annual meeting of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario on Tuesday. “Perhaps no change has been as significant as those made to the way we build and operate our buildings. And the changes are progressing. We are confident that Wal-Mart stores will be among the greenest on the block.”
Read the rest of this story ...
Posted by Alex Goldschmidt | Permalink
WAL-MART TO BUILD NEAR PROTECTED CIVIL WAR BATTLEFIELDS?
Wal-Mart and the Wilderness. [Hardtac and Hard Times]
Before I say another word, let me remind you that the Civil War Preservation Trust is NOT a knee-jerk, anti-development group; we do not assume that all developers are bad people, and we do not oppose responsible economic growth. In fact, there are several developers who have worked very closely with us to save battlefield land. We welcome and seek out such partnerships!
Stop Wal-Mart [Rantings Of A Civil War Historian]
There are three major corporations that I absolutely despise. I absolutely and categorically refuse to do business with two of them...The third is the Walton empire. Wal-Mart is notorious for forcing its way into communities and killing off local businesses, whether it’s wanted or not. In many instances, it’s not wanted, but it matters not to Wal-Mart. The latest atrocity by Wal-Mart is probably the most unforgivable of all: it wants to build one of its superstores ON the Wilderness battlefield, regardless of the historical significance of the ground, and regardless of what the community might have to say about it. It MUST be stopped.
CWPT Leads Effort To Stop Wal-Mart At The Wilderness [National Trust For Historic Preservation]
Leading the charge against the Wal-Mart plan are CWPT and the Warrenton-based Piedmont Environmental Council. Their “Wilderness Battlefield Coalition” also includes the National Trust for Historic Preservation, the National Parks Conservation Association, Friends of the Wilderness, and Friends of the Fredericksburg Area Battlefields. Representatives of all six organizations signed the letter.
Wal-Mart is Wiping Out American History - Literally [La Vida Locavore]
Now Wal-Mart wants to do more than just censoring books and music, putting entire towns’ worth of Moms ‘n Pops out of business, and basically selling America to China to wipe out American culture and history. What could be worse and more un-American than that? Oh, funny you should ask. They want to build a Supercenter on the site of the Civil War Battle of Wilderness.
THE UNIONIZATION OF WAL-MART CANADA
Wal-Mart is not above the law. [Writing On The Wal]
So what did I miss while I was in lovely Southern California? “Gatineau Wal-Mart workers awarded contract: Arbitrator imposes only labour pact for retailing giant in North America” [Yes, I see that Robert has already covered this story, but do you really expect me to leave news like this alone?] My source, The Ottawa Citizen offers the full context:
Wal-Mart: 8 Unionized Employees [Mindful Mission]
“Incompatible?" Really? Paying decent wages and giving decent benefits are “incompatible” with the way you do business? Thanks for reminding me why I have not shopped at Wal-Mart in years.
TOM COUGHLIN RAKES IN THE CASH
Wal-Mart, Coughlin settle [Arkansas Blog]
The Morning News account indicates Judge Jay Finch ordered reporters out of the courtroom on the ground that it was a meeting room where parties were discussing settlement. But the minute the judge and a court reporter sat down to have an agreement entered into the record, I’d think court was in session. Absent a compelling reason not apparent here, the session should have been open.
I’ve been doing this Wal-Mart blogging thing for far too long [Writing On The Wal]
This is my first greatest hits post, devoted to the guy who’s now $6.75 million richer, Tom Coughln. Here’s me from July 19, 2005…
Read the rest of this story ...
Posted by Eric Bull | Permalink
More good news out of Canada: UFCW is beginning to map out its strategy to use the victory in Gatineau as a springboard to unionize other Canadian Wal-Mart stores:
In Quebec, hearings are underway before arbitrator Corriveau for a collective agreement for unionized Wal-Mart employees at a store in St. Hyacinthe. And the UFCW is now reportedly interested in unionizing the 240 employees at the Wal-Mart store in Gatineau, next to the garage.
It’s hard to underestimate the importance of the victory in Gatineau. All Wal-Mart Canada associates have seen that the Gatineau contract has immediately raised starting wages from $8.40 to $10.89. And aside from good press and momentum, a legal precedent has been set in Quebec - which should be harder to reverse in Canada than in the U.S..
Union ramping up Wal-Mart drive [Montreal Gazette]:
Union leaders are preparing to use a history-making collective agreement won by nine Wal-Mart garage workers to organize more of the retailer’s Canadian stores.
The United Food and Commercial Workers, which negotiated the Quebec contract, is especially interested in Wal-Mart Canada Corp.’s Supercentres, which have undercut rivals and forced down wages in Ontario.
Read the rest of this story ...
Posted by Eric Bull | Permalink
Breaking news from the CBC: a Canadian arbitrator will impose on Wal-Mart a collective agreement signed by employees in Gatineau, Quebec. The agreement involves wage raises and more vacation time for the eight employees at the store’s tire and lube shop. It’s the first time such an agreement has been implemented at a Wal-Mart in North America. A spokesperson for the company expressed unhappiness with the deal, stating that collective bargaining with employees is “incompatible” with the company’s business model. Details sure to follow.
UPDATE: More from Reuters
Landmark Wal-Mart ruling released by Quebec arbitrator [CBC News]
A Quebec arbitrator has imposed a collective agreement on Wal-Mart for the first time in the world’s largest retailer’s history.
The arbitrator released the decision Friday on the contract for eight workers at a tire-and-lube garage at a Wal-Mart store on Maloney Boulevard in Gatineau, just across the river from Ottawa. The workers are represented by the United Food and Commercial Workers Canada.
Guy Chenier, head of the local representing the workers, said the union is delighted with the deal, which gives the workers raises averaging 35 to 40 per cent effective immediately, as well as more vacation.
A spokesman for Wal-Mart said the company is unhappy with the decision and it is “incompatible” with the company’s way of doing business. Wal-Mart is the biggest company in the world, according to the Fortune 500 rankings, and recorded nearly $13 billion US in profits in 2007 — yet its front-line employees make less than $20,000 US a year, on average, and the company has been cited for union-busting tactics by government agencies and independent watchdogs.
Read the rest of this story ...
Posted by Alex Goldschmidt | Permalink
Date set for OMB hearing on Wal-Mart [Stratford Beacon Herald (Canada)]
An Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing involving Wal-Mart’s bid to set up shop in Stratford is set for Jan. 20.
The date for the hearing, which is expected to last four to six weeks, was affirmed yesterday by OMB adjudicator Karlene Hussey during a pre-hearing conference at City Hall.
Parties to the hearing, including the City of Stratford, Tanurb (Festival Marketplace), the City Centre Committee, Loblaws and Zellers agreed to a teleconference with the board Aug. 21 to work out procedural matters and to a late October conference to finalize a list of issues to be addressed.
Any new parties or participants would be identified at that time as well, said Avonwood’s legal representative Mary Bull.
Yesterday’s conference was brief, with the main contention being whether objectors to Avonwood’s proposal for a 135,000-square-foot retail project in the city’s east end (that’s excluding additional retail space and a Home Depot store) should have to cite their issues with the proposal even before the matter goes before city council or to a public meeting.
Read the rest of this story ...
Posted by Tony Calero | Permalink
Downtown Not Worried By Wal-Mart Expansion Plans [SooNews.com (Canada)]
Council will soon hear plans of the Canadian Sault Wal-Mart seeking permission to expand its store.
The store opened in Sault Ste. Marie in January 2003. At the time a restriction on the size of the store was implemented. Originally Wal-Mart had plans on building a 160,000 square foot store in 2002 - however with concerns raised by the Downtown Association at the time, council requested Wal-Mart reduce its size.
It did - instead building a store about 100,000 square feet in size.
Anna Boyonoski, manager of the Downtown Association says she met with Wal-Mart Canada officials to go over what they have planned.
“We don’t see an impact on the downtown with the planned expansion” Boyonski told SooNews.ca Monday.
“From our understanding, it’s primarily a grocery store that Wal-Mart is interested in”
Read the rest of this story ...
Posted by Joel Nezianya | Permalink
Check out this week’s issue of the Wal-Mart Watch Weekly Update for Elected Officials – a compilation of Wal-Mart news from across the country and beyond.
This week’s issue focuses again on Wal-Mart’s efforts to warn its managers across the country of a Democratic win in this November’s elections. The company has been holding mandatory meetings for its store managers and department supervisors (possibly in violation of state and federal election law), who are being warned that if Democrats win in November it could lead to potential store unionization. And speaking of unionization, read how Wal-Mart’s attempt to bust up unions in Canada has made it all the way to Canada’s Supreme Court, while on the other side of the globe all Wal-Mart stores in China will have labor contracts by September 2008.
In addition to the aforementioned stories, you’ll also find Bloomberg and the International Herald Tribune questioning whether a slowdown in Wal-mart sales could be a negative sign for the U.S. economy in the future. And on the environmental side of things, you’ll find the Christian Science Monitor among others discussing Wal-Mart’s opposition to carbon-offset guidelines, while the New York Times and Newsweek explain why concerns over keeping costs at low levels has lead Wal-Mart to drastically alter how its products are made and transported.
And finally, check out our “Stateside” and “Wal-Mart International” sections to find out what’s going on with Wal-Mart around the country and across the globe.
Wal-Mart Watch Weekly Update for Elected Officials
Posted by Corey Himrod | Permalink
When Wal-Mart employees in Jonquiere, Quebec secured the right to unionize in 2005, labor activists saw it as a touchstone victory for low wage workers everywhere....that is, until Wal-Mart shut down its entire operation in Jonquiere, disbanding any hopes of a unionized work force there. Wal-Mart’s controversial move has been the subject of lawsuits ever since, and the case is now moving to Canada’s Supreme Court, which will decide whether Wal-Mart violated Canadian labor law.
The case comes as another group of Wal-Mart employees, also in Quebec, are on the verge of unionizing a Wal-Mart Tire and Lube Shop. Labor advocates expect Wal-Mart to react the same way it did in 2005: by shutting down operation rather than see employees unionize. This practice exposes how afraid Wal-Mart is of unions, and its international union-busting practices are part of a deeply-rooted company practice of keeping wages low and employees’ rights lower.
While the Canadian Supreme Court debates the 2005 Jonquiere case, how will Wal-Mart deal with employees unionizing efforts today and in the future?
Workers say store closed because they unionized [Camwest News via National Post (Canada)]
The Supreme Court of Canada will weigh in on a high-stakes dispute between retail giant Wal-Mart and former employees at a store in Jonquiere, Que., which shut down in 2005 after workers secured the right to unionize.
The closure drew attention continent-wide because Wal-Mart is the world’s largest retailer and the Jonquiere outlet, located about three hours north of Quebec City, was one of the first in North America to be organized.
Former clerks Gaetan Plourde, Johanne Desbiens, Ingrid Ratte and Claudine Beaumont will have their day in court to argue that Wal-Mart violated labour laws in union-strong Quebec by shutting down during negotiations for an inaugural collective agreement.
Read the rest of this story ...
Posted by Alex Goldschmidt | Permalink
Today’s story in the Montreal Gazette reported Wal-Mart is likely to close a Tire and Lube Shop in Canada which is on the verge of unionizing. Wal-Mart has pulled this same move twice before: once with the meat-cutters department at a Texas store and in another instance, at a store in Jonquière, Quebec. As is evidenced by these three cases, Wal-Mart would rather close an entire store than see it unionized.
Friday’s story in the Wall Street Journal further exposes Wal-Mart’s fear of unions in North America. The company’s attempt to intimidate employees with threats of lost jobs and less power show how critical low wages are to Wal-Mart’s business model, and how far the company will go to prevent unions at its stores.
Yet despite the company’s vehement opposition to unions in North America, Wal-Mart is currently signing collective bargaining agreements with employees at its retail stores in China. This additional chapter to Wal-Mart’s long, contentious history with labor activists and union members adds a new facet to the Wal-Mart unionization debate. Read more about these instances and more in our new fact sheet:
Click here to download “Wal-Mart: Save Money, Bust Unions” (PDF)
Posted by Research Team | Permalink
Fresh on the heels of anti-union propagandizing at the company comes news from Canada that Wal-Mart is on the verge of closing a Tire and Lube shop which is about to unionize. This isn’t the first time that Wal-Mart has closed a store rather than see it unionize: the company outsourced meatpacking when its butchers unionized, and shuttered a store in Jonquiere, Quebec after the employees there voted for a union. Despite the fact that experts expect all 206 of Wal-Mart’s stores in China to sign collective bargaining agreements in the next month, it seems the retailer is still dead set against allowing unions to form in its North America stores.
Read more on the Battle-Mart blog >>>
Decision looms for Wal-Mart [Montreal Gazette]
Union leaders say they expect Wal-Mart Canada Corp. to shut down a garage it operates in Gatineau after workers are presented with their first collective agreement.
Guy Chénier, president of the union local representing garage workers, said Wal-Mart has already hinted it will close the shop. In 2005, Wal-Mart came under fire for closing a store in Jonquière after workers won union accreditation.
In Gatineau, across the river from Ottawa, Wal-Mart garage workers have been unionized since 2005, and are now waiting for their first collective agreement following binding arbitration that ended in June.
It’s not clear when the contract will be imposed, but the union says it expects it to be soon.
Read the rest of this story ...
Posted by Alex Goldschmidt | Permalink
Well, first it was the tomato that was the culprit. Then tomatoes were deemed clean, and safe to eat again. Then, in a twist of culinary fate, a new villain in the salmonella outbreak showed its face - a spicy little number possibly originating at a farm down in Mexico. The jalepeno pepper. And now the tiny pepper has turned its capsaicin-spewing fury on Wal-Mart.
Actually, the complaint at issue was filed on behalf of Delores, Colorado resident Brian Grubbs against Wal-Mart and an unknown supplier, referred to in the complaint as “John Doe”. According to the lawsuit, the Grubbs family purchased jalapeño peppers from the Wal-Mart Supercenter in Cortez, Colorado in late June. Grubbs and his family proceeded to eat them over the next week. According to the Rocky Mountain News:
Samples showed he was positive for salmonella Saintpaul, and later the jalapeño peppers back at his house that he hadn’t yet eaten also tested positive for that strain of salmonella, the suit said.
“Consumers believe that retailers like Wal-Mart know the quality and safety of products they sell,” Marler said. “Retailers benefit from that trust, and must be held accountable for the products they sell.”
Salmonella is, of course, no fun at all - Salmonellosis illnesses from the Saintpaul strain began showing up in Texas and New Mexico in late April, and in early June the CDC linked those illnesses to raw tomatoes and issued consumer warnings. Those warnings were, of course, completely wrong - the list of possible culprits was first widened before eventually being narrowed to raw jalapeno and serrano peppers.
On July 30, the FDA confirmed the presence of salmonella Saintpaul at a farm in Mexico, both in irrigation water and on produce. The investigation is continuing.
Man sickened by jalapeños files first salmonella lawsuit [Rocky Mountain News]
Read the rest of this story ...
Posted by Corey Himrod | Permalink
View Wal-Mart Watch's videos on YouTube
