Latest Headlines
An odd story in the Wall Street Journal today. Apparently Wal-Mart workers in St. Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec just received a union contract imposed by an arbitrator - making them the only Wal-Mart in North American to have such a contract. Great news, right?
Unfortunately, the entire story was written in a Wal-Mart perspective, so it’s hard to get a real handle on what actually happened. There are no quotes from workers or union representatives, and no mention of any of the non-wage components of the contract.
We can be glad that there is actually a signed contract at a North American Wal-Mart. But if it’s true that that the contract keeps wages at the “status quo,” there’s a lot to be disappointed in.
Even in Canada, where labor laws are more favorable to workers than they are in the U.S., Wal-Mart retains an outrageously unfair amount of power over the situation. It’s evidence enough that even after Wal-Mart workers form a union and get a signed contract, Wal-Mart gets a one-sided story in the Wall Street Journal where it:
a) gloats that it won’t have to give any raises
b) leaves open the possible threat of store closure, and
c) says publicly that the company “doubts employees in Saint-Hyacinthe will feel better off given they’ve lost the company’s ‘open-door process’ and have to pay dues.”
Publicly chastising its hard-working associates for trying to improve their own lives? How would Sam Walton feel about that?
We know how it makes us feel: that we need to pass the Employee Free Choice Act. Now.
UPDATE: The National Post has a lot more to say about the story here. Apparently UFCW is claiming victory as well—which is encouraging news.
Wal-Mart Says Contract Keeps Status Quo At Quebec Store [Wall Street Journal]:
An arbitrator has imposed a contract on a Wal-Mart Canada Corp. store in Quebec that the company says preserves the status quo for wages and benefits.
The store in Saint-Hyacinthe, about an hour east of Montreal, was certified by the United Food and Commercial Workers union in January 2005 without a vote. Binding arbitration began in late 2006.
Read the rest of this story ...
Posted by Eric Bull | Permalink
SEARCH WAL-MART WATCH
Most Popular Tags
associates benefits chicago employees jobs labor news profits stores wages walmart workersTop Posts
- Chicagoist’s Three-Part Series on Working at Walmart
- Good Jobs Chicago, Living wage, Wal-Mart
- A Walmart in Your Backyard
- Wal-Mart Exposed For “Outdated and Sexist” Hiring Practices
- John Perkins on Walmart’s Donation to Chile
- The Oakland Tribune on Our Week of Action
- Wake Up Walmart on Huffington Post
- WakeUpWalmart.com and Activists Demand Walmart Change its Sick Day Policy
Archive
Subscribe to this blog
Subscribe to the Wal-Mart Watch RSS Feed
![]()







View Wal-Mart Watch's videos on YouTube
Contact Us
Have a tip? Contact us.
Blogroll
- The Writing on the Wal
- Arizonans Against Wal-Mart
- Austin Full Circle
- Behind the Counter
- Bedford Watch
- Big-Box Swindle
- Big Box Toolkit
- Confined Space
- Earth Works
- Hometown Advantage
- Interfaith Worker Justice
- India FDI Watch
- Working Life
- JR Monsterfodder
- Living With Wal-Mart Construction
- Moms Vs. Wal-Mart
- Neighborhood Retail Alliance
- nosuperwalmart.com
- Out Community First
- Our Town Damariscotta
- Purple Ocean
- Sweat Free Communities
- Stop Sprawl-Mart
- The Consumerist – Shoppers Bite Back
- Think Progress
- Wake-Up Wal-Mart
- Wal-Mart Associate Centeral
- Wal-Mart Movie
- Wal-Mart Watch Chinese Blog
- Wal-Mart Free NYC Coalition
- Wal-Mart Workers Association








